PDA

View Full Version : AR15's aren't the only gun under attack.


Tall Shadow
02-19-2007, 11:38 PM
While Zumbo is making waves all over the AR15 community ( ARFCOM (http://www.ar15.com) ), let's not forget the >Ever Wonderful< Brady Campaign's fight for "Keeping America Safe!" is still grinding away at all of the rest of Our firearms.
*************
Below is a post from John_Wayne777
one of the members at ARFCOM.....
*************
Lots of hunters in our nation are unfortunately convinced that "reasonable gun control" measures are a good idea.

They need to realize that the gun control morons are not interested in banning evil black rifles only. They aren't going to stop there.

As proof, I want you to read the following article taken from the Brady Campaign's MySpace page. Look very carefully, because it advocates banning the .30-06 and the .30-30 because they are "long distance murder rifles."




The tragic proliferation of Sniper Rifles

I would like to take a moment to comment on the proliferation of Sniper Rifles.
Sniper Rifles are typically equipped with a high-powered scope, and every single one of them can blow through the body armor cops wear. They can even penetrate multiple police cars. Does the Second Amendment protect cop-killer Sniper Rifles? The NRA certainly thinks so, along with the powerful gun lobby that wants your children and your law enforcement officers to be at risk from these weapons of mass destruction. Some of these Sniper Rifles can even penetrate ballistic or armored glass, lightly armored vehicles, and armored limousines. Senator Ted Kennedy attempted to solve this with an important bill that would have banned armor piercing ammunition and protected lawful firearm commerce:

"Another rifle caliber, the 30.30 caliber, was responsible for penetrating three officers' armor and killing them in 1993, 1996, and 2002. This ammunition is also capable of puncturing light-armored vehicles, ballistic or armored glass, armored limousines, even a 600-pound safe with 600 pounds of safe armor plating.....

..It is outrageous and unconscionable that such ammunition continues to be sold in the United States of America.."

Should our elected officials live under the threat of reprisal on their lives from disgruntled constituents? The Gun Lobby seems to think so. We disagree.

Sniper Rifles can be equipped with precision optics above even what the Military uses, allowing a sniper to deliver rounds within millimeters of accuracy - enabling them to engage targets at distances of well over one hundred meters. Is there a pressing need to be able to kill with accuracy at that distance? It is too far to justify as self defense. It is too far for hunting. It is only useful for those who wish to murder from afar.

Large caliber Sniper Rifles such as the .50 Browning Machine Gun can derail freight cars, shoot down aircraft and helicopters, damage vital ground equipment such as power substations, fuel tanks, and air traffic control, and cause complete chaos. For more information on why large caliber machine-gun rounds must be banned, visit http://www.50caliberterror.com. A shipment of large caliber machine-gun round sniper rifles made by Steyr turned up in Iran, and are being used on our own soldiers, as the .50 bullets easily defeat their body armor, their up-armored Humvee, and even APCs.

Many forward thinking, progressive politicians such as Ted Kennedy, Chuck Schumer, Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama have voted against Center-Fire Rifle Ammunition of types for Sniper Rifles, but due to the pressure and massive financial resources of the gun industry, the necessary steps to protect our homes and lives have not been attained.

Sniper Rifles have been used by murderers and spree killers for years, with notable incidents such as the Beltway Snipers, the Clock tower Sniper, and more.

ANY rifle configured and equipped as a sniper rifle has no sporting purpose especially as a hunting rifle. They are too big and heavy to take to the field. Designed for distance shooting, they are useless for the ranges at which game animals are normally shot, and when used on sporting sized game at range they often just wound the animal, inhumanely forcing it to die slowly while the would-be hunter tracks it to finish it off. Most Sniper Rifles fire atypically large cartridges and ultra high velocity ammunition that can travel much greater distances that standard ammunition. The danger imposed from missed shots and ricochets from these specialty rounds is unreasonable.

Most of these rifles carry multiple rounds, with either an automatic mechanism, or a quick toggle action to rapidly move another bullet into the breech, ready to fire into another victim. In most states, they are nearly unrestricted. Anyone over the age of 18 can buy one. If they can't pass a background check, they skirt the NCIS system by going to a gun show, or finding a private sale in the newspaper. A murderer camped at a distance from a public gathering could quickly turn it into a massacre dwarfing anything we have seen before in the United States, if they had a Sniper Rifle. If they adopted hit and run tactics, entire portions of our country could be shut down.

Sniper Rifles shoot a high powered bullet that is almost always fatal. They are designed for one thing- delivering powerful overkill with deadly precision. You don't need the kind of power and accuracy that can kill a man at five hundred yards for hunting rabbits or defending your house.

We should also give commendations to France because many years ago they designated any firearm capable of shooting military ammunition as a military arm, illegal to posses without a special permit and unlawful to use for hunting. The 223, 308, 7mm Mauser, 30-06, and 6.5x55 have no place in the hunting fields of France. Firearms shooting these calibers are military weapons only designed for killing PEOPLE and should be kept out of the hands of the general population. Because they have no hunting purpose, there is no reason for civilians to own them.

Every state in the USA has hunting equipment rules that limit the caliber of firearm used to take game. They also limit the types of rifles, length, magazine capacity, etc. States should amend these hunting regulations to restrict the use of "sniper" rifles, specialty "sniper" cartridges, and "sniper" ammunition. Limits on weight, barrel length, bipods and tripods, thumb hole stocks and pistol grips, night vision type scopes, scopes of excessive magnification, super magnum and high velocity ammunition, and military slings should be imposed. They have no place in the hunting fields of America and hunting usage should not be used as an argument for civilians to own such firearms and weapons. There are more than ample hunting rifles, cartridges, and rounds of ammunition to choose from without them.

Let us hope that in a safer, saner America, we will succeed in our efforts to restrict the deadly spread of long distance murder rifles.




The original article can be found here:

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=88508969&blogID=231968340&MyToken=41f3abaf-84d8-4107-9db8-b0fc00e9da7c

PLEASE! share this with all your friends who hunt. They need to know that the Brady campaign isn't going to be satisfied with eliminating AR15s and AK clones....They want to ban Remington 700s too.

This isn't about "assault weapons". It is about eliminating ALL private ownership of firearms.

*******************
Tall Shadow

Riposte1
02-20-2007, 11:04 AM
Absolutely. The tactic is to nibble away at our rights. It is far beyond the point right now of the camel's nose being under the tent.... he has his whole head in and he is chewing on the rug!

Riposte

Dan Morris
02-21-2007, 06:25 AM
These fokls got into office...except Zumbo and Brady.....by liberal
sheepies. We have GOT to draw a line and give no more!By
becoming active and vocal, we CAN turn this.
Dan
:(

PJgunner
02-22-2007, 04:39 PM
Dan Morris said, " We have got to draw a line and give no more! By becoming active we CAN turn this."

HERE, HERE! Absolutely. This is nothing more and nothing less than a Second Amendment issue. The following is something I have posted elsewhere. Pardon the pun, but I believe the following is some good ammunition to shoot down the Brady Bunch and the antis in Congress. Note the wording of the Militia Act of 1792, Title 10 of the U.S. Code, and the ruling of the Supreme Court in U.S. v. Miller (1939) Seems to me evry federal gun control law is not only unconstitutional but illegal as well.


"OK, lets discuss the 2nd Amendment. Good idea. It is my carefully considered opinion that the KEY WORD is MILITIA.

1. The Militia Act of 1792. One year after the Second Amendment was added to the Constitution, Congress passed a law defining the militia. The Militia Act of 1792 declared that all free male citizens between the ages of 18 and 44 were to be members of the militia. Furthermore, every citizen was to be armed. The act stated:
"Every citizen...[shall] provide himself with a good musket, a sufficient bayonet and belt, two spare flints...."

The Militia Act of 1792 made no provision for any type of select militia such as the National Guard.

U.S. Senate Subcommittee Report (1982) "In the Militia Act of 1792, the second Congress defined 'militia of the United States' to include almost every free adult male in the United States. These persons were obligated BY LAW (emphasis mine) to possess a [military style] firearm and a minimum supply of ammunition and military equipmemnt....There can be little doubt from this that when the Congress and the people spoke of the a 'militia,' they had reference to the traditional concept of the entire populace capable of bearing arms, and not to any formal group such as what is today called the national Guard."

Current Federal Law: 10 U.S.C. Sec. 311. "The militia of the Untied States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and...under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States.....

Supreme Court: U.S. v. Miller 1939 In this case, the Court stated that, "The Militia comprised of all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense...[and that] when called for service, these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves AND OF THE KIND IN COMMON USE AT THE TIME. (emphasis mine)
(BTW, Miller lost in court because he did not show up. It was never taken into account that his no show was because he had passed away.)

More on Title 10 of the U.S. Code

UNITED STATES CODE
TITLE 10 - ARMED FORCES
Subtitle A - General Military Law
PART I - ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL MILITARY POWERS
CHAPTER 13 - THE MILITIA

Sec. 311. Militia: composition and classes

(a)The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 302, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.

(b) The classes of the militia are -

(1) the organized militia which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia;
and

(2) The unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or of the Naval Militia.

Now it took me all of about ten minutes to find all that information. Just go to the Gun Owners of America's website and look for their firearms fact sheet. There's 24 pages of good information there.

I plan on making copies of the above and sending each of my representatives their own personal copy. Feel free to do the same. Maybe, if they get flooded with as many letters with the above as Zumbo's sponsers did on his major foot in mouth problem, the idiots just might get a message. Leave our guns alone."
Paul B.


COMPROMISE IS NOT AN OPTION!

8X56MS
02-25-2007, 09:55 AM
this has been attributed to the Brady group, but is in fact, a fraud.

fabsroman
02-25-2007, 05:39 PM
Always, always, always check the authenticity of stuff. I saw a post on here about Pelosi's tax scheme, and it was completely off base of what she actually proposed. This country is so divided because everybody has a closed mind about everything. It either has to be completely supportive of their position or it isn't good and we are just so eager to accept anything that is negative about a democrat that we look like morons when we try to pass this stuff for truth. I have gotten to the point where I do not even forward stuff unless I can find something on Snopes verifying the matter.

The internet is a great thing, but untruths can spread on it quicker than wild fire. Look how quickly Zumbo's matter was spread. Thankfully, it was true and the man lost his job based upon a truth.

Aim to maim
02-25-2007, 06:35 PM
Originally posted by fabsroman
Always, always, always check the authenticity of stuff. I have gotten to the point where I do not even forward stuff unless I can find something on Snopes verifying the matter.



Bravo, hooray!!!!!! We have a winner. Go to the head of the class. Give the man a cigar.

Now if I could just get my well-meaning friends (and posters on every forum of which I am a member) to be equally discerning without offending them........:rolleyes:

rattus58
02-25-2007, 08:00 PM
Look.... although Snopes or snoops, or scoops or whatever don't authenticate, so what?

The point is... that as long as you are not citing them as the author of something YOU PUBLISH it doesn't matter, what does matter though is that the sentiments expressed are in fact real, maybe not word for word, they are real and it is best that we all assume that everything written against some evil weapon is against all of us, for in fact they are.

Aloha... :cool:

fabsroman
02-25-2007, 11:38 PM
The sentiment is real, but in the real world this stuff would be called libel and/or slander. I'm sure you wouldn't want people saying untruths about you or your position on something, or putting words in your mouth, if they didn't like you. Just because we don't support democrats doesn't mean we should put up a bunch of lies about them. Just because democrats put up a bunch of lies about republicans doesn't mean we should stoop to their level.

The post about Pelosi and her tax schemes was so off base that I found it hilarious. In fact, after reviewing what she wants to do about taxes, I actually support her position on it. Essentially, I believe she wanted to tax corporations and the super rich at a higher rate, and possibly increase the capital gains rate and the tax rate on dividends. The capital gains rate and dividends rate help those that own tons of stucks/mutual funds. Something tells me that the poor and the lower middle class are not in that category. Heck, the middle class itself might not be in that category either. So, the rich get to earn nice returns on unearned income (i.e., capital gains and dividends), while the working people have to pay tax at 25%. Granted, there is a 10% tax rate, but I think it runs out pretty quickly.

Tall Shadow
02-27-2007, 03:49 PM
8X56MS, fabsroman, and Aim to maim Are absolutly Correct!

This was a fabricated story, and I do apologize for posting it as True.


I do know, however, that while it was fabricated.....It was also Dead-on with how the Anti's Have been/and will again, go after EVERY gun, firearm, or bladed weapon.

We in the Hunting/Shooting community Must Stick together! The people who do want Our guns, Are in power. The only things keeping them from drafting sweeping legislation right now, is the infighting in their party, The knowledge that the NRA would fight it (I hope) every step of the way, and that (I again hope) the Bush would veto it, if it ever made it that far.

Zumbo's blog is a symtom of a deep underlying problem in Our communtiy. The lack of understanding amongst Us, over our diferent reasons for gun ownership.

For some, it's only about hunting, or the shooting sports. Others it's only home or personal defense. Still others believe it's all about the protection of our rights against tyranny.

I'm in just about all of the above catagories...some more than others.

Many in our community are in one, and only one. That's fine too, but these same people, are against Anyone in any of the Other categories......sometimes militantly so...as in Zumbo's case.

The anti's will use this as fuel to undo Us.

These people, if not "Brought back into the fold", will surely be our undoing. As has been said before........

We are Our own worst enemy.

We have to heal Our wounds....and become one again.

Tall Shadow

Ridge Runner
03-03-2007, 10:20 AM
Why do you say its a fraud? please explain?
RR

MN Tonester
03-04-2007, 03:56 PM
Have any of you made your thoughts known to your congressmen? This is the response I got back from mine (a Dem with a "B" [I think] rating from the NRA - used to be "A" but toed the party line a few times).

Thank you for your _expression of opposition to the Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act (H.R. 1022). I appreciate hearing from you concerning this important issue.

H.R. 1022 would reinstate for 10 years the assault weapons ban which expired on September 13, 2004. This legislation is currently awaiting consideration in the House Committee on the Judiciary.

I am following this issue closely and will keep your views in mind as debate over Second Amendment rights continues.

I don't really know what he'll actually do, but at least he acknowledged this is really a 2nd Amendment issue (as opposed to a 'black gun' issue). If enough gun owners actually get in touch with their reps (whethey they are rabid antis or not) they will know that the gun owners of America have gotten a wake up call. Now is not the time for an elitist attitude among gun owners. The antis want to ban ALL GUNS.

Tall Shadow
03-06-2007, 03:42 PM
Originally posted by Ridge Runner
Why do you say its a fraud? please explain?
RR

It was written as an Anti-gun "Propaganda Type" piece by one of our own. Something that I have VERY mixed emotions about. On one hand it is a good >Wake Up< call to ALL gun owners... On the other hand, it has made some of Us, including me, more wary of things we see, read, or hear about.....which might cause us to disregard Real important information that we are unsure of.

Tall Shadow

Tall Shadow
03-06-2007, 03:45 PM
Originally posted by MN Tonester
Have any of you made your thoughts known to your congressmen? This is the response I got back from mine (a Dem with a "B" [I think] rating from the NRA - used to be "A" but toed the party line a few times).

I don't really know what he'll actually do, but at least he acknowledged this is really a 2nd Amendment issue (as opposed to a 'black gun' issue). If enough gun owners actually get in touch with their reps (whethey they are rabid antis or not) they will know that the gun owners of America have gotten a wake up call. Now is not the time for an elitist attitude among gun owners. The antis want to ban ALL GUNS.

Unfortunately Here in Michigan, we are saddled with some of the most liberal representation in the country. While I've contacted ALL of my representitives....I doubt that My views will make a lick of difference in how they vote......But it's worth a shot.....

$%*)%^$)_(^ *! Liberals!!! :mad: :rolleyes: :confused:

Tall Shadow