PDA

View Full Version : stand by...


DON WALKUP
01-12-2008, 11:53 AM
info i got from the NRA tells me there are some really insidious proposals going in within the california state legislature and U.S. congress right now.

one being, if you own twenty or more guns, that is; receivers that can complete a fire arm, you must get an "arsenal" permit at the cost of $300.00 per year and submit to three inspections a year from the ATF at your expense and have a permit for EACH firearm.

photo ID for ANY gun owner.

limit the size and caliber of cartridges.

fellas, we are standing at the door of a police state; like it or not. the way has been paved by the like of bill clinton, diane feinstein, ted kennedy and such and will soon be opened. possibly by a democratic nominee that becomes president. we know where hillary and barack stand on the second amendment.

:(

PJgunner
01-13-2008, 02:39 PM
"we know where hillary and barack stand on the second amendment."

Where do you think most of the so called republicans stand. Huckabee, Thompson and Paul are the only pro-gunners on the list. All the others at least supooert an AWB and rectal orifaces like Juliani want even more restrictions. :mad:
Can you say TREASON?
Paul B.

Valigator
01-13-2008, 03:09 PM
I just read this to my boyfriend

tell them they can go ***them selves....I would say thats the overall attitude of gun owners wouldnt you???:cool:

multibeard
01-13-2008, 04:19 PM
I did get this in an email the other day. At least some of the idiotic gun law crapp is getting over turned out there. I think maybe I might have posted this in a thread on here after I got it but here it is again


January 9, 2008

San Francisco Gun Ban Ruled Null and Void
NRA Wins Big in California State Court of Appeals

Fairfax, VA - The California State Court of Appeals announced today their decision to overturn one of the most restrictive gun bans in the country, following a legal battle by attorneys for the National Rifle Association (NRA) and a previous court order against the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.

"Today's decision by the California State Court of Appeals is a big win for the law-abiding citizens and NRA Members of San Francisco," declared Chris W. Cox, NRA's chief lobbyist.

In 2005, NRA sought an injunction against the San Francisco Board of Supervisors to prevent them from enacting one of the nation's most restrictive gun bans. NRA won the injunction, but the City's mayor and Board of Supervisors ignored the court order and approved a set of penalties, including a $1,000 fine and a jail term of between 90 days and six months, for city residents who own firearms for lawful purposes in their own homes.

"We promised our California NRA members in 2005 that we would fight any gun ban instituted by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, and we haven't given up that fight," continued Cox. "Today we see our second win for the Second Amendment against the San Francisco gun ban. We beat them once in court and the City's attorney appealed based on his personal disagreement with the court's first decision to overturn the ban. Now we've beaten them again. The California State Court of Appeals has upheld the state preemption law."

Today's decision came in the form of a 3-0 opinion in favor of the lower court ruling overturning the gun ban.

"This decision is a thoughtful and well-reasoned legal opinion," concluded Cox. "I'd like to thank our approximately 4 million members, including the hundreds of thousands of members in California, for their continued commitment to protecting our cherished freedoms." -nra-

I was in California once and that was along time ago, like 1947 if I rember right. I have no interest in ever going back!!!