jon lynn
04-23-2010, 10:00 PM
:mad:I just found a Dark Lord Sith!
I have felt a disturbance in the force! I have discovered a new enemy. The VPC!
Maybe these clowns have been around for a while. But I was searching Google for some sections of John Plaser’s Ulltimate Sniper, for some old M16A1 info. But a whole bunch of….sh…..er…’crap’ came up.
It was written by the fine cowardly folks of the Violence Policy Center (dot org). Never heard of them before today.
What a bunch of crap! I mean I thought politicians could twist words, and give stuff out of context. But this crew put a twist that Bush or Obama could never manage, for any reason. And this is not even scratching the surface of the FIFTY-SIX PAGES of dribble. Every fact distorted to give a false meaning.
THEY ACTUALLY POSTED THIS!
It is clear, the gun industry stands ready to arm and train anyone with the fantasy of being a real life sniper.with an extremely powerful weapon, the sniper rifle uses high-caliber ammunition at extraordinarily long ranges.
HOW ABOUT A NICE SCARE TACTIC?
Sold over the counter at an American gun
shop, the same destruction could be turned on Americans at home.
WHAT THE HECK DOES THAIS EVEN MEAN????
To be sure, the casual use of the word “sniper” to refer to a gun does not
make it a sniper rifle. However, the studied avoidance of the word “sniper” in
reference to a purpose-designed or purpose-built sniper rifle does not make it
something different.
HERE IS A GOOD TWIST
Many foreign sniper rifles cannot be imported into the US if they carry the word
“sniper” in their nomenclature and have to be renamed “target,” “longrange,” “precision varmint with sniper accuracy,” “marksman,” “sharpshooter,” etc.
With out a good, school trained actual sniper behind it, the rifle is just a rifle. It does not become a sniper-rifle until the sniper is behind it. Or am I wrong?
Man am I ANGRY!
I have felt a disturbance in the force! I have discovered a new enemy. The VPC!
Maybe these clowns have been around for a while. But I was searching Google for some sections of John Plaser’s Ulltimate Sniper, for some old M16A1 info. But a whole bunch of….sh…..er…’crap’ came up.
It was written by the fine cowardly folks of the Violence Policy Center (dot org). Never heard of them before today.
What a bunch of crap! I mean I thought politicians could twist words, and give stuff out of context. But this crew put a twist that Bush or Obama could never manage, for any reason. And this is not even scratching the surface of the FIFTY-SIX PAGES of dribble. Every fact distorted to give a false meaning.
THEY ACTUALLY POSTED THIS!
It is clear, the gun industry stands ready to arm and train anyone with the fantasy of being a real life sniper.with an extremely powerful weapon, the sniper rifle uses high-caliber ammunition at extraordinarily long ranges.
HOW ABOUT A NICE SCARE TACTIC?
Sold over the counter at an American gun
shop, the same destruction could be turned on Americans at home.
WHAT THE HECK DOES THAIS EVEN MEAN????
To be sure, the casual use of the word “sniper” to refer to a gun does not
make it a sniper rifle. However, the studied avoidance of the word “sniper” in
reference to a purpose-designed or purpose-built sniper rifle does not make it
something different.
HERE IS A GOOD TWIST
Many foreign sniper rifles cannot be imported into the US if they carry the word
“sniper” in their nomenclature and have to be renamed “target,” “longrange,” “precision varmint with sniper accuracy,” “marksman,” “sharpshooter,” etc.
With out a good, school trained actual sniper behind it, the rifle is just a rifle. It does not become a sniper-rifle until the sniper is behind it. Or am I wrong?
Man am I ANGRY!