View Full Version : midrange .44 magnum load?
Mr. 16 gauge
08-16-2011, 03:52 PM
Does anyone know of a factory loaded mid range .44 magnum load, something along the lines of the old Remington midrange load (240 grain lead SWC at approx. 100 fps)?
Yes, I know I can produce such a handload easily, and yes, I know I can load the gun with .44 specials....but I don't want to go with either of those options.
Thanks in advance.............
powell&hyde
08-16-2011, 07:34 PM
I'm hoping thats a mistake in your typing, but 100fps?????
Mr. 16 gauge
08-16-2011, 10:46 PM
VI'm hoping thats a mistake in your typing, but 100fpsv
Yah....big mistake! SHould have read "1000 fps"......damn typos!:rolleyes:
powell&hyde
08-17-2011, 07:27 AM
Here is a company that a few of my buddies uses since they don't reload. I have chrony them at 1050fps for a 240gr lswc. And the price at this writing is $23.00 for 50.
http://georgia-arms.com/new44remmag240grleadsemi-wadcutter50pk.aspx
Adam Helmer
08-17-2011, 03:00 PM
Mr.16 gauge,
I have not seen Mid-range .44 Magnum loads on the shelf at my local gun shop this Century.
I am curious why you want lower power .44 Magnum loads. I would have suggested buying factory .44 Specials to arrive at the same lower level of performance. For myself, my .44 Magnums see lots of .44 Special loads with a dose of 2400 (Now Above the Book Loads, but below Book loads in previous reloading manuals) and my cast #429244 240 grain SWC.
I am not sure SASS shooters use magnums, but they sure shoot lots of .44 Specials at the club.
Adam
Mr. 16 gauge
08-18-2011, 08:57 AM
I am curious why you want lower power .44 Magnum loads.
I was thinking about using my M29 to carry concealed while in the woods. I was looking for something that was more "antipersonell" as opposed to "anti grizzly bear", that would be more controllable to shoot....
...and plus, I wanted the cases for reloading; I reload for .44 magnum, but not .44 special.
That's all!:D
Evan03
08-28-2011, 01:13 PM
i loaded elmer keiths 310gr cast bullets and 12 grains of something. this was pushed through a 7.5" barrel , not sure id want to squeeze this load out a concelled car gun.
a 240 at 1000 to 1200 would be much tamer.
i just noticed concealed int he woods. even though a human may be encounterd while carrying concealed in the woods i think id still kinda plan on downing more critters then 2 legged gitters
popplecop
08-29-2011, 10:03 PM
Personally I'd choose something easier to carry concealed than my md. 29 or Ruger SA 44 for what you describe. The .44 mag is a great hunting cartridge and I use it for just that. Anything else I'll go with one of my 1911s, lot easier to carry.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.