Hunt Chat - What good can a handgun do against an army?

Hunt Chat (http://www.huntchat.com/index.php)

- Almost Anything Goes (http://www.huntchat.com/forumdisplay.php?f=37)

- - What good can a handgun do against an army? (http://www.huntchat.com/showthread.php?t=48964)

What good can a handgun do against an army?

I found this while surfing today and had to share it with all my internet kin here at HC. The pic from the article is actually posted at the bottom.

Quote:

http://transsylvaniaphoenix.blogspot...inst-army.html

By Mike Vanderboegh

A friend of mine recently forwarded me a question a friend of his had posed:

"If/when our Federal Government comes to pilfer, pillage, plunder our property and destroy our lives, what good can a handgun do against an army with advanced weaponry, tanks, missiles, planes, or whatever else they might have at their disposal to achieve their nefarious goals? (I'm not being facetious: I accept the possibility that what happened in Germany, or similar, could happen here; I'm just not sure that the potential good from an armed citizenry in such a situation outweighs the day-to-day problems caused by masses of idiots who own guns.)"

If I may, I'd like to try to answer that question. I certainly do not think the writer facetious for asking it. The subject is a serious one that I have given much research and considerable thought to. I believe that upon the answer to this question depends the future of our Constitutional republic, our liberty and perhaps our lives. My friend Aaron Zelman, one of the founders of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership told me once:

"If every Jewish and anti-nazi family in Germany had owned a Mauser rifle and twenty rounds of ammunition AND THE WILL TO USE IT (emphasis supplied, MV), Adolf Hitler would be a little-known footnote to the history of the Weimar Republic." - Aaron Zelman, JPFO

Note well that phrase: "and the will to use it," for the simply-stated question, "What good can a handgun do against an army?", is in fact a complex one and must be answered at length and carefully. It is a military question. It is also a political question. But above all it is a moral question which strikes to the heart of what makes men free, and what makes them slaves. First, let's answer the military question.

Most military questions have both a strategic and a tactical component. Let's consider the tactical.

A friend of mine owns an instructive piece of history. It is a small, crude pistol, made out of sheet-metal stampings by the U.S. during
World War II. While it fits in the palm of your hand and is a slowly-operated, single-shot arm, it's powerful .45 caliber projectile
will kill a man with brutal efficiency. With a short, smooth-bore barrel it can reliably kill only at point blank ranges, so its use
requires the will (brave or foolhardy) to get in close before firing. It is less a soldier's weapon than an assassin's tool. The U.S.
manufactured them by the million during the war, not for our own forces but rather to be air-dropped behind German lines to resistance
units in occupied Europe. Crude and slow (the fired case had to be knocked out of the breech by means of a little wooden dowel, a fresh
round procured from the storage area in the grip and then manually reloaded and cocked) and so wildly inaccurate it couldn't hit the
broad side of a French barn at 50 meters, to the Resistance man or woman who had no firearm it still looked pretty darn good.

WWII Liberator Pistol cal. 45ACP

This will be in several pieces due to length

GoodOlBoy

Quote:

The theory and practice of it was this:

First, you approach a German sentry with your little pistol hidden in your coat pocket and, with Academy-award sincerity, ask him for a light for your cigarette (or the time the train leaves for Paris, or if he wants to buy some non-army-issue food or a half- hour with your "sister"). When he smiles and casts a nervous glance down the street to see where his Sergeant is at, you blow his brains out with your first and only shot, then take his rifle and ammunition. Your next few minutes are occupied with "getting out of Dodge," for such critters generally go around in packs. After that (assuming you evade your late benefactor's friends) you keep the rifle and hand your little pistol to a fellow Resistance fighter so they can go get their own rifle.

Or maybe you then use your rifle to get a submachine gun from the Sergeant when he comes running. Perhaps you get very lucky and pickup a light machine gun, two boxes of ammunition and a haversack of hand grenades. With two of the grenades and the expenditure of a half-a-box of ammunition at a hasty roadblock the next night, you and your friends get a truck full of arms and ammunition. (Some of the cargo is sticky with "Boche" blood, but you don't mind terribly.)

Pretty soon you've got the best armed little maquis unit in your part of France, all from that cheap little pistol and the guts to use it. (One wonders if the current political elite's opposition to so-called "Saturday Night Specials" doesn't come from some adopted racial memory of previous failed tyrants. Even cheap little pistols are a threat to oppressive regimes.)

They called the pistol the "Liberator." Not a bad name, all in all.

Now let's consider the strategic aspect of the question, "What good can a handgun do against an army....?" We have seen that even a poor pistol can make a great deal of difference to the military career and postwar plans of one enemy soldier. That's tactical. But consider what a million pistols, or a hundred million pistols (which may approach the actual number of handguns in the U.S. today), can mean to the military planner who seeks to carry out operations against a populace so armed. Mention "Afghanistan" or "Chechnya" to a member of the current Russian military hierarchy and watch them shudder at the bloody memories. Then you begin to get the idea that modern munitions, air superiority and overwhelming, precision-guided violence still are not enough to make victory certain when the targets are not sitting Christmas- present fashion out in the middle of the desert.

"A billion here, a billion there, sooner or later it adds up to real money." --Everett Dirksen

Consider that there are at least as many firearms-- handguns, rifles and shotguns-- as there are citizens of the United States. Consider that last year there were more than 14 million Americans who bought licenses to hunt deer in the country. 14 million-- that's a number greater than the largest five professional armies in the world combined. Consider also that those deer hunters are not only armed, but they own items of military utility-- everything from camouflage clothing to infrared "game finders", Global Positioning System devices and night vision scopes.

Consider also that quite a few of these hunters are military veterans. Just as moving around in the woods and stalking game are second nature, military operations are no mystery to them, especially those who were on the receiving end of guerrilla war in Southeast Asia. Indeed, such men, aging though they may be, may be more psychologically prepared for the exigencies of civil war (for this is what we are talking about) than their younger active-duty brother-soldiers whose only military experience involved neatly defined enemies and fronts in the Grand Campaign against Saddam. Not since 1861-1865 has the American military attempted to wage a war athwart its own logistical tail (nor indeed has it ever had to use modern conventional munitions on the Main Streets of its own hometowns and through its relatives' backyards, nor has it tested the obedience of soldiers who took a very different oath with orders to kill their "rebellious" neighbors, but that touches on the political aspect of the question).

But forget the psychological and political for a moment, and consider just the numbers. To paraphrase the Senator, "A million pistols here, a million rifles there, pretty soon you're talking serious firepower." No one, repeat, no one, will conquer America, from within or without, until its citizenry are disarmed. We remain, as a British officer had reason to complain at the start of our Revolution, "a people numerous and armed."

The Second Amendment is a political issue today only because of the military reality that underlies it. Politicians who fear the people seek to disarm them. People who fear their government's intentions refuse to be disarmed. The Founders understood this. So, too, does every tyrant who ever lived. Liberty-loving Americans forget it at their peril. Until they do, American gunowners in the aggregate represent a strategic military fact and an impediment to foreign tyranny. They also represent the greatest political challenge to home-grown would-be tyrants. If the people cannot be forcibly disarmed against their will, then they must be persuaded to give up their arms voluntarily. This is the siren song of "gun control," which is to say "government control of all guns," although few self-respecting gun-grabbers would be quite so bold as to phrase it so honestly.

Joseph Stalin, when informed after World War II that the Pope disapproved of Russian troops occupying Trieste, turned to his advisors and asked, "The Pope? The Pope? How many divisions does he have?" Dictators are unmoved by moral suasion. Fortunately, our Founders saw the wisdom of backing the First Amendment up with the Second. The "divisions" of the army of American constitutional liberty get into their cars and drive to work in this country every day to jobs that are hardly military in nature. Most of them are unmindful of the service they provide. Their arms depots may be found in innumerable closets, gunracks and gunsafes. They have no appointed officers, nor will they need any until they are mobilized by events. Such guardians of our liberty perform this service merely by existing. And although they may be an ever-diminishing minority within their own country, as gun ownership is demonized and discouraged by the ruling elites, still they are as yet more than enough to perform their vital task. And if they are unaware of the impediment they present to their would-be rulers, their would-be rulers are painfully aware of these "divisions of liberty", as evidenced by their incessant calls for individual disarmament. They understand moral versus military force just as clearly as Stalin, but they would not be so indelicate as to quote him.

Here is another part of it.

GoodOlBoy

Quote:

The Roman Republic failed because they could not successfully answer the question, "Who Shall Guard the Guards?" The Founders of this Republic answered that question with both the First and Second Amendments. Like Stalin, the Clintonistas could care less what common folk say about them, but the concept of the armed citizenry as guarantors of their own liberties sets their teeth on edge and disturbs their statist sleep.

Governments, some great men once avowed, derive their legitimacy from "the consent of the governed." In the country that these men founded, it should not be required to remind anyone that the people do not obtain their natural, God-given liberties by "the consent of the Government." Yet in this century, our once great constitutional republic has been so profaned in the pursuit of power and social engineering by corrupt leaders as to be unrecognizable to the Founders. And in large measure we have ourselves to blame because at each crucial step along the way the usurpers of our liberties have obtained the consent of a majority of the governed to do what they have done, often in the name of "democracy"-- a political system rejected by the Founders. Another good friend of mine gave the best description of pure democracy I have ever heard. "Democracy," he concluded, "is three wolves and a sheep sitting down to vote on what to have for dinner." The rights of the sheep in this system are by no means guaranteed.

Now it is true that our present wolf-like, would-be rulers do not as yet seek to eat that sheep and its peaceable wooly cousins (We, the people). They are, however, most desirous that the sheep be shorn of taxes, and if possible and when necessary, be reminded of their rightful place in society as "good citizen sheep" whose safety from the big bad wolves outside their barn doors is only guaranteed by the omni-presence in the barn of the "good wolves" of the government. Indeed, they do not present themselves as wolves at all, but rather these lupines parade around in sheep's clothing, bleating insistently in falsetto about the welfare of the flock and the necessity to surrender liberty and property "for the children", er, ah, I mean "the lambs." In order to ensure future generations of compliant sheep, they are careful to educate the lambs in the way of "political correctness," tutoring them in the totalitarian faiths that "it takes a barnyard to raise a lamb" and "all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

Every now and then, some tough old independent-minded ram refuses to be shorn and tries to remind the flock that they once decided affairs themselves according to the rule of law of their ancestors, and without the help of their "betters." When that happens, the fangs become apparent and the conspicuously unwilling are shunned, cowed, driven off or (occasionally) killed. But flashing teeth or not, the majority of the flock has learned over time not to resist the Lupine-Mandarin class which herds it. Their Founders, who were fiercely independent rams, would have long ago chased off such usurpers. Any present members of the flock who think like that are denounced as antediluvian or mentally deranged.

There are some of these dissidents the lupines would like to punish, but they dare not-- for their teeth are every bit as long as their "betters." Indeed, this is the reason the wolves haven't eaten any sheep in generations. To the wolves chagrin, this portion of the flock is armed and they outnumber the wolves by a considerable margin. For now the wolves are content to watch the numbers of these "armed sheep" diminish, as long teeth are no longer fashionable in polite society. (Indeed, they are considered by the literati to be an anachronism best forgotten and such sheep are dismissed by the Mandarins as "Tooth Nuts" or "Right Leg Fanatics".) When the numbers of armed sheep fall below a level that wolves can feel safe to do so, the eating will begin. The wolves are patient, and proceed by infinitesimal degrees like the slowly-boiling frog. It took them generations to lull the sheep into accepting them as rulers instead of elected representatives. If it takes another generation or two of sheep to complete the process, the wolves can wait. This is our "Animal Farm," without apology to George Orwell.

Even so, the truth is that one man with a pistol CAN defeat an army, given a righteous cause to fight for, enough determination to risk death for that cause, and enough brains, luck and friends to win the struggle. This is true in war but also in politics, and it is not necessary to be a Prussian militarist to see it. The dirty little secret of today's ruling elite as represented by the Clintonistas is that they want people of conscience and principle to be divided in as many ways as possible ("wedge issues" the consultants call them) so that they may be more easily manipulated. No issue of race, religion, class or economics is left unexploited. Lost in the din of jostling special interests are the few voices who point out that if we refuse to be divided from what truly unites us as a people, we cannot be defeated on the large issues of principle, faith, the constitutional republic and the rule of law. More importantly, woe and ridicule will be heaped upon anyone who points out that like the blustering Wizard of Oz, the federal tax and regulation machine is not as omniscient, omnipotent or fearsome as they would have us believe. Like the Wizard, they fan the scary flames higher and shout, "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!"

For the truth is, they are frightened that we will find out how pitifully few they are compared to the mass of the citizenry they seek to frighten into compliance with their tax collections, property seizures and bureaucratic, unconstitutional power-shifting. I strongly recommend everyone see the new animated movie "A Bug's Life". Simple truths may often be found sheltering beneath unlikely overhangs, there protected from the pelting storm of lies that soak us everyday.

"A Bug's Life", a childrens' movie of all things, is just such a place.

The plot revolves around an ant hill on an unnamed island, where the ants placate predatory grasshoppers by offering them each year one-half of the food they gather (sounds a lot like the IRS, right?). Driven to desperation by the insatiable tax demands of the large, fearsome grasshoppers, one enterprising ant goes abroad seeking bug mercenaries who will return with him and defend the anthill when the grasshoppers return. (If this sounds a lot like an animated "Magnificent Seven", you're right.)

The grasshoppers (who roar about like some biker gang or perhaps the ATF in black helicopters, take your pick) are, at one point in the movie, lounging around in a bug cantina down in Mexico, living off the bounty of the land. The harvest seeds they eat are dispensed one at a time from an upturned bar bottle. Two grasshoppers suggest to their leader, a menacing fellow named "Hopper" (whose voice characterization by Kevin Spacey is suitably evil personified), that they should forget about the poor ants on the island. Here, they say, we can live off the fat of the land, why worry about some upstart ants? Hopper turns on them instantly. "Would you like a seed?" he quietly asks one. "Sure," answers the skeptical grasshopper thug. "Would you like one?" Hopper asks the other. "Yeah," says he. Hopper manipulates the spigot on the bar bottle twice, and distributes the seeds to them.

"So, you want to know why we have to go back to the island, do you?" Hopper asks menacingly as the thugs munch on their seeds. "I'll show you why!" he shouts, removing the cap from the bottle entirely with one quick blow. The seeds, no longer restrained by the cap, respond to gravity and rush out all at once, inundating the two grasshoppers and crushing them. Hopper turns to his remaining fellow grasshoppers and shrieks, "That's why!"

I'm paraphrasing from memory here, for I've only seen the movie once. But Hopper then explains, "Don't you remember the upstart ant on that island? They outnumber us a hundred to one. How long do you think we'll last if they ever figure that out?"

"If the ants are not frightened of us," Hopper tells them, "our game is finished. We're finished."

Of course it comes as no surprise that in the end the ants figure that out. Would that liberty-loving Americans were as smart as animated ants.

and here is a third part

Quote:

Courage to stand against tyranny, fortunately, is not only found on videotape. Courage flowers from the heart, from the twin roots of deeply-held principle and faith in God. There are American heroes living today who have not yet performed the deeds of principled courage that future history books will record. They have not yet had to stand in the gap, to plug it with their own fragile bodies and lives against the evil that portends. Not yet have they been required to pledge "their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor." Yet they will have to. I believe with all my heart the lesson that history teaches: That each and every generation of Americans is given, along with the liberty and opportunity that is their heritage, the duty to defend America against the tyrannies of their day. Our father's father's fathers fought this same fight. Our mother's mother's mothers fought it as well. From the Revolution through the world wars, from the Cold War through to the Gulf, they fought to secure their liberty in conflicts great and small, within and without.

They stood faithful to the oath that our Founders gave us: To bear true faith and allegiance-- not to a man; not to the land; not to a political party, but to an idea. The idea is liberty, as codified in the Constitution of the United States. We swear, as did they, an oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. And throughout the years they paid in blood and treasure the terrible price of that oath. That was their day. This is ours. The clouds we can see on the horizon may be a simple rain or a vast hurricane, but there is a storm coming. Make no mistake.

Lincoln said that this nation cannot long exist half slave and half free. I say, if I may humbly paraphrase, that this nation cannot long exist one-third slave, one-third uncommitted, and one-third free. The slavery today is of the mind and soul not the body, but is slavery without a doubt that the Clintons and their toadies are pushing.

It is slavery to worship our nominally-elected representatives as our rulers instead of requiring their trustworthiness as our servants. It is slavery of the mind and soul that demands that God-given rights that our Forefathers secured with their blood and sacrifice be traded for false security of a nanny-state which will tend to our "legitimate needs" as they are perceived by that government.

It is slavery to worship humanism as religion and slavery to deny life and liberty to unborn Americans. As people of faith in God, whatever our denomination, we are in bondage to a plantation system that steals our money; seizes our property; denies our ancient liberties; denies even our very history, supplanting it with sanitized and politicized "correctness"; denies our children a real public education; denies them even the mention of God in school; denies, in fact, the very existence of God.

So finally we are faced with, we must return to, the moral component of the question: "What good can a handgun do against an army?" The answer is "Nothing," or "Everything." The outcome depends upon the mind and heart and soul of the man or woman who holds it. One may also ask, "What good can a sling in the hands of a boy do against a marauding giant?" If your cause is just and righteous much can be done, but only if you are willing to risk the consequences of failure and to bear the burdens of eternal vigilance.

A new friend of mine gave me a plaque the other day. Upon it is written these words by Winston Churchill, a man who knew much about fighting tyranny:

"Still, if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Winston Churchill

The Spartans at Thermopolae knew this. The fighting Jews of Masada knew this, when every man, woman and child died rather than submit to Roman tyranny. The Texans who died at the Alamo knew this. The frozen patriots of Valley Forge knew this. The "expendable men" of Bataan and Corregidor knew this. If there is one lesson of Hitlerism and the Holocaust, it is that free men, if they wish to remain free, must resist would-be tyrants at the first opportunity and at every opportunity. Remember that whether they the come as conquerors or elected officials, the men who secretly wish to be your murderers must first convince you that you must accept them as your masters. Free men and women must not wait until they are "selected", divided and herded into Warsaw Ghettos, there to finally fight desperately, almost without weapons, and die outnumbered.

The tyrant must be met at the door when he appears. At your door, or mine, wherever he shows his bloody appetite. He must be met by the pistol which can defeat an army. He must be met at every door, for in truth we outnumber him and his henchmen. It matters not whether they call themselves Communists or Nazis or something else. It matters not what flag they fly, nor what uniform they wear. It matters not what excuses they give for stealing your liberty, your property or your life. "By their works ye shall know them."

The time is late. Those who once has trouble reading the hour on their watches have no trouble seeing by the glare of the fire at Waco. Few of us realized at the time that the Constitution was burning right along with the Davidians. Now we know better.

We have had the advantage of that horrible illumination for more than five years now-- five years in which the rule of law and the battered old parchment of our beloved Constitution have been smashed, shredded and besmirched by the Clintonistas. In this process they have been aided and abetted by the cowardly incompetence of the "opposition" Republican leadership, a fact made crystal clear by the Waco hearings. They have forgotten Daniel Webster's warning: "Miracles do not cluster. Hold on to the Constitution of the United States of America and the Republic for which it stands-- what has happened once in six thousand years may never happen again. Hold on to your Constitution, for if the American Constitution shall fail there will be anarchy throughout the world."

Yet being able to see what has happened has not helped us reverse, or even slow, the process. The sad fact is that we may have to resign ourselves to the prospect of having to maintain our principles and our liberty in the face of becoming a disenfranchised minority within our own country.

The middle third of the populace, it seems, will continue to waffle in favor of the enemies of the Constitution until their comfort level with the economy is endangered. They've got theirs, Jack. The Republicans, who we thought could represent our interests and protect the Constitution and the rule of law, have been demonstrated to be political eunuchs. Alan Keyes was dead right when he characterized the last election as one between "the lawless Democrats and the gutless Republicans." The spectacular political failures of our current leaders are unrivaled in our history unless you recall the unprincipled jockeying for position and tragi-comedy of misunderstanding and miscommunication which lead to our first Civil War.

And make no mistake, it is civil war which may be the most horrible corollary of the Law of Unintended Consequences as it applies to the Clintonistas and their destruction of the rule of law. Because such people have no cause for which they are willing to die (all morality being relativistic to them, and all principles compromisable), they cannot fathom the motives or behavior of people who believe that there are some principles worth fighting and dying for. Out of such failures of understanding come wars. Particularly because although such elitists would not risk their own necks in a fight, they have no compunction about ordering others in their pay to fight for them. It is not the deaths of others, but their own deaths, that they fear. As a Christian, I cannot fear my own death, but rather I am commanded by my God to live in such a way as to make my death a homecoming. That this makes me incomprehensible and threatening to those who wish to be my masters is something I can do little about. I would suggest to them that they not poke their godless, tyrannical noses down my alley. As the coiled rattlesnake flag of the Revolution bluntly stated: "Don't Tread on Me!" Or, as our state motto here in Alabama says: "We Dare Defend Our Rights."

But can a handgun defeat an army? Yes. It remains to be seen whether the struggle of our generation against the tyrants of our day in the first decade of the 21st Century will bring a restoration of liberty and the rule of law or a dark and bloody descent into chaos and slavery.

If it is to be the former, I will meet you at the new Yorktown. If it is to be the latter, I will meet you at Masada. But I will not be a slave. And I know that whether we succeed or fail, if we should fall along the way our graves will one day be visited by other free Americans, thanking us that we did not forget that, with the help of Almighty God, in the hands of a free man a handgun CAN defeat a tyrant's army.

http://transsylvaniaphoenix.blogspot...inst-army.html

and here is the end. good reading even if it is long.

GoodOlBoy

At least someone else knows the truth..But he knew how to say it. It is seriously time to take names and kick A$$. It may be too late. While we must have laws and probably taxes I think it is way past time to let the politicians in this country know who really is in charge. They think at this time it is them..and as Churchill said..there will come a time..Is that time upon us?? I truly hope not..but hold dim hope.

The game is not ever over until you are no longer in the game. I was asked what I would do when the folks with "black helicopters" came to my door for my firearms. I told him I was an old fellow, who had had a pretty good life; a good wife, fine children, and wonderful grandchildren. If it was now time for me to pay the bill, they would receive my firearms, muzzle first. If I must die, let it be with honor and giving the call for other old guys to step up for freedom.

The Libarator is a very interesting pistol. It is said to be the only gun ever made that took longer to load than it did to make. They were air dropped by the 1,000`s over France in WW11. A great piece of history.

I've had a couple of 'em One was new in the package with all the stuff. They came with 6 or 7 rounds of ammo in the butt. The other one I did shoot. It was ugly and had been shot in the past. Had a spot or two that looked like blood areas..seriously. Brought back from France after the Battle of the Bulge. It was terrible as far as accuracy. it woulda been ok as a belly gun... Not hard to load but took some time. Terrible trigger but ok for belly work. Better than throwin rocks. And the scenario that was posted earlier was just what it was supposed to be for..Kill the scentry and take his much better gun etc etc:cool:

i think it's important to remember
that, if the given situation were to
occur -

many of those in the army would
choose not to fire on american
civilians, but to join them,

as did robert e. lee and several
others in the civil war.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 44mag (Post 335110)

many of those in the army would
choose not to fire on american
civilians, but to join them,

as did robert e. lee and several
others in the civil war.

That said.. Many in the Civil war chose to fire on civilians The majority of the Maryland Legislature was arrested and put in jail by the Army so they couldn't vote on secession. The citizens demonstrated against this in Baltimore and many were killed by Union soldiers. So don't think it won't happen. Many in the military believe in blind obedience...as do many police officers....as they are taught. Duty above honor?? Hopefully not...and hopefully we won't have to find out. But at this point it don't look good for the good guys. Way it looks now we're gonna get Nobamacare by the end of the month. If we do I hope we can get the congress and others in the gummit to have to live with what they give us. How do ya think that would float??

the only way/hope that a 'civilian' uprising would stand a chance at all would be by masses, very large masses of organized, well trained masses, uniting to simply overpower the local LE SWAT type operations, if that occurred, then they'd call out the national guard...local LE are usually very intolerant and would not stand for a defeat...

we live in a police state whether you want to admit or not.

think about how many guns can be brought to bear on us if called upon to do so WITHOUT military intervention:

local police/sheriff/marshal
county sheriff/marshal
state police
state game wardens
corrections officers

many, if not all, of them are almost as well armed as the military. that includes helicopters, armored vehicles, full auto weapons as well as near artillery level weapons such as the Barrett .50 BMG.

it will take extraordinary circumstance to begin an armed rebellion in this country; the consequences will be extremely high if there is.

most local, county, state agencies will stop at nothing to force their will on the public...right or wrong.

but...if enough handguns are used in the right place at the right time...anything is possible.

I'm glad I have more cvonfidence in my brothers at arms. Many I've talked with have made it perfectly clear that will NEVER obey orders to turn their might against mom, dad, brothers sisters uncles and aunt and other friends that they now fight for opposing that which would be the result of them turning against their home and family. A lot of what I've read here sounds like someone is s defeatist. I'll die defending my way of life before letting a dictatorial group fell America. There's more than one way to skin a cat as the saying goes. Cut the head off the snake and.....so on, so on and so on.....Most who lead these groups are cowards and the followers have no minds of their own.

Defeatist attitude??

MJ ihave to answer the defeatist attitude comment.

I really do not think it is a defeatist attitude..it is practical thnking. I know many police etc etc. worked with many for years. Now as to the police I really think the older guys would not turn on the populace. But there are waaayy too many who enjoy the power they can wield over the average citizen. When I took courses with the police trainees I saw it daily with the things that were taught. They actually taught the young ones coming onto the force that they were "better" than the average citizen..That the average Joe or Jane would lie rather than speak the truth. Look at the daily operations that some police depts follow. Have a search warrant?? Go break down the door at 0 dark 30..non uniformed with some carrying machine guns..while masked?? MASKED?? What do they have to fear to be masked? Would you protect your home against people such as this?? All the stuff that they wear is available to the general populace for all intents and purposes..Anyone can holler POLICE!!

As Don said..

think about how many guns can be brought to bear on us if called upon to do so WITHOUT military intervention:

local police/sheriff/marshal
county sheriff/marshal
state police
state game wardens
corrections officers

This is true. Anyone who works for them have a sworn duty(right or wrong) to do as they are ordered. Most will because they have a living to make ..kids in school..medical bills mortgage.etc etc etc. OK..some would refuse..and would at the least lose their jobs.but the majority WOULD do as they are told..right or wrong..legal or not. As the saying goes..the history of a war is written by the victors.. Sad to say but the things that are happening in this country ...right in Congress in fact are not really constitutionally legal. Government running private business?? Shoving universal health care down our throats while reducing senior health benefits?? Is this all better for US? I really don't see a way to stop these Marxists short of an armed rebellion..and sad to say again..It just ain't gonna happen. We raised a group of kidswho want it now an want someone else to pay for it. Our fault..my generations fault I mean. We wanted better for our kids and gave it to them..but didn't make them understand the costs and responsibilities associated with the country they enjoyed. I hate to hear a soccer mom(or dad) say I don't want the draft back..little Johnny might get killed in the Army. Responsibility?? Where?? Who's??:rolleyes:

GOB,

To answer your question about "what good is a handgun against an army?" let me say IF every home owner confronted WHACKED 3 or 4 of the Jackbooted Thugs at their door, in SHORT Time NO THUG would want to be the :First Guy: to breech ANY DOOR!

In 1856 in Columbia, PA three runaway slave families took shelter in a stone farmhouse. A Maryland Sheriff and 8 deputies were hot on the runaway's trail and at dawn rushed the farmhouse. The three men had double barrel shotguns stoked with buckshot and fired on the Sheriff and deputies. When the smoke cleared the Sheriff and 4 deputies were dead, two wounded and ALL, who could, fled back to Maryland.

Frederick Douglass said, "The best way to make a DEAD issue of the 1850 Fugitive Slave Act is to make a few DEAD Slave Catchers." Nuff said!

Adam

Also bear in mind that if a sherriff or other leo refused such an order the threat is always there that the same foce could be brought to bear on them and their families. It could get grim very VERY quickly.

GoodOlBoy

GOB,

THAT is why I keep a 12 gauge with 5 shells in the elastic stock loop by my bedroom door. IF THE JACKBOOTED THUGS want TOUGH, then let them come here. I TAKE NO PRISONERS! Waco proved they take NO Prisoners and we gotta do what we gotta do!

ALL who cannot decide what to do, let me SUGGEST they "GROW A PAIR!!"
(Females Excepted!)

Adam

Tell us how you really feel:D Actually you are not alone in your thinking..but the sad fact is the only ones at this time who can really afford to do as you have said here is us oldtimers. Gummit wants us dead anyway..cuttin our medicare bennies and givin 'em to illegals and useless pieces of dirt who feel even if they don't work they are owed everything..just because they live here! I also feel as you do. Guess we are on the short list already, huh?

Yeah well thats what ya get for bogartin all the creamed corn and mashed taters at the buffet!

Adam I have that same brand o medicine, as well as a couple others sittin round. . . . I know whatcha mean

GoodOlBoy

Guys,
I went through this here in Florida. We had the police chief of Miami in his former role as a member of the legislature put forth a new law to seize all semi auto guns in the state and the legislature was to vote on the law. I took a Suburban full of folks over to Tallahassee and we with 50,000 other folks stood on the capitol steps for a little rally. We heard many speeches and some made the hair on your neck stand up. This is how the real commitment shakes out and it can be no other way:

....I am not going to give up my guns without a fight. You will have to send someone onto my property to take my guns, by force. I fully expect to be killed in the fight and fully understand that you are going to kill me.... but you must understand that I am going to kill many of you before I die. So when you come on my property for my guns, make very sure you come prepared to die with me....

Now what good is a pistol against an army? After 50,000 people on the capitol steps took the above oath, every sheriff in the state, in writing, stated they would not send one deputy to enforce the law if it was passed. I was there and I saw it first hand. Commit to die if necessary and be vocal and the message gets through loud and clear. It is like slapping a politician in the face. Consequences to their action gets their attention.

Ed

Well, the question was, what good is a handgun againstan army? Look at the Warsaw Ghetto as an example. The jews trapped inside the ghetto had exactly 6 handguns, so the history goes. They used them to shoot German soldiers and took over their guns and ammo. It would really be interesting to see just how long they would have held out if the Germans had not bombed and shelled the ghetto into rubble. IIRC, while they may have been wiped out, they made it damned costly on the Germans.

Look at what happened to the Russians in Afghanistan when fighting the Muhagadeen (sp) They were doing a pretty fair job of holding their own and we all know how fiercely the Afghans cling to their guns.
Look how the VC forught their guerrilla war aganst us, or how the muzzies are making it difficult for us in Iraq and Afghanistan.

As well armed as the American populace is, they could make "Big Brother" very uncomfortable, possibly enough that he would seek terms, not that I'd trust him any farther than I could pick up an Abrams tank and throw it.

As uncomfortable as the thought of having to do this is, maybe we all should take stock, seriously think about what Obama and his traitorist communist cohorts are doing, and prepare for the worst.
Paul B.

local police/sheriff/marshal
county sheriff/marshal
state police
state game wardens
corrections officers

these are just lazy overweight donut grinders here, cept the wardens and they would have our backs, what your not realizing is if things get bad enough for things to get ugly all those officers you mention are lower/middle class tax payers who are taking the punches right along with us.
RR

I'd like to add that:

WE, the voters, have allowed legislatures to get out of control.

just look at the average legislator in congress now...very, very few have military, let alone combat experience, very few have LEO background, almost everyone of them is worth at least a million dollars (john Kerry was worth nearly two billion as i recall. will he really need a pension and health care from congress when he "retires"?) few if any have to struggle day to day; one term in congress and they have a sizable life time pension with heath care funded by the taxpayer...why would they care about the average "Joe six-pack"? how many years did you have to work before you were able to retire? some folks are NEVER able to retire...

it's odd, but aren't a great number of socialists/Marxists VERY wealthy? Marx, Lenin, Guevara, Castro, Chavez, to name just a few.

i, for one, am totally DISGUSTED with this administration and this congress...

how does it go? our lives and destiny are controlled by three boxes:
the soap box
the ballot box
the ammunition box

Don. It's actually four boxes.

1. The soap box.
2. The ballot box.
3. The jury box.
4. The bullet box.

I wonder just how close are we to number ?

1. When do we take our country back?
2. Can we take our country back.
3. Do the sheeple even give a damn?

"What good fortune for government that the people do not think."
Adolph Hitler.
Paul B.