im a big hater of brakes of any kind shape or form, will not ever use or try one.
if i cant shoot it i cant shoot and will drop the caliber like a bad habit.
sorry bout the getn alittle testy when you threw out there that a brake might help with seeing the impacts.
ive just never been fan and dont care to be, i may be misn out in the long range world without one while shootin a decent kickers.
the 168amax had the same bs as the 175 whatever it is, ill check just to make sure. ill try a slew of bullets in the 165-180.
the reason i want to try the barnes tripple shock is because of the high BC and they shoot very well behind a sizln hot load in my 25.06 maybe the 300 would be the same. the first bullets i try will be the 168 amax. because it just may be where i stay if acuracy is there. then second will be the tripple shock due to the fast that i need(want) a tough bullet for elk and larger sized game. i may end up pushn nsler BTs aswell. they havent done me wrong so far.
my being lazy about the milldot thing isnt saveing me cany money by going with the premier reticle range compesateing reticle. the reticle will cost 255 to be installed in my scope. thats puts the price of the 6-18 loe at dang near 800. if i could talk myself into running a normal milldot i could get into a better scope for that amount of cash. i realy dont want to mess with drop charts and all that.
there wouldnt be anything cooler than looking through my scope and knowing the the first dot is 300yds, 2nd dot is 400 3rd is 500 and 4th is 600. and set up to my load to boot. but would just save me frustration. id be out there proveing the dots right or wrong on paper at those ranges.
so is 255 bucks worth it to save me some frustration. i think so, i may even get alittle piece of mind outa the deal to.
thanks guys for your replys
i realy enjoy hearing what everyones got to say
Evan