|
Fabs, my point of the tylenol recall was that they were proactive, not dragging their feet, deny it all the way reactive like tikka. Tylenol spent major bucks on pulling existing product off the shelves, millions of bottles worth. How many rifles could be affected? A few thousand? Either way cost shouldn't matter when a product has a very real potential to injure, maim, blind or kill the user. Once a company gets a bad rep, it is hard to overcome especially in the firearm world where impressions die hard. It seems like companies don't want to do the right thing until legally or finacially compelled to do so. And that is most likely going to happen in this case.
__________________
...my mistake, make that 4 coffins...
|