[Purebred Redneck]

Because one guy says something and a few people actually listen does not mean the organization is full of terrorists. Besides, the guy in your media player was about to **** himself as he was talking...
and yea, prolife is not a tax-free organization but it is organized and thus could be just as dangerous...as it has proved. You can not make a particular stance illegal just because
1. a few make the group look bad
2. you disagree with them.


the fact is if a petition read simply
"PETA is group of animal activists and they should not have a tax free status"
There are countless numbers of gun owners who would sign such a ridiculas piece of paper.

My point is how many people belonging to the NRA has openly said they would open their front door blazing away in a last burst of glory if the government knocked on their door to collect firearms if legislation was passed and supported by the general public (through who they vote for).
This has been typed on every single firearm forum I have ever been on...including right from the mouth of Heston. Now this is far more radical in tone and reaction. I dont' see any NRA members saying - whoa the NRA has gone too far on that one --- no they applaud it and want more. What's the difference? The difference is you (no one in particular nor anyone on these forums) agree with the NRA's general adgenda and oppose any organization to any extent possible who stand in the way.

I'm not talking about Heston because his statement was purly motivational - but when real people say this
1. They are either talking out of pure emotion or want to appear cocky
2. they would really do it.

If it's #2, the gun industry (at least on firearm forums on the internet and people I've met on the range) contains 1000 times more potential terrorists than the anti-gun agency.

Before we proceed, I would like to add I'm not arguing, slamming, or attacking anyone. I'm mearly offering this up for an reasonable and friendly debate.