[fabsroman]

I think we are going to have to start laying out fact patterns here. Kind of like when I write an opinion for a client of mine, I always say "According to the facts you have supplied me, which are the following: yadda, yadda, yadda, it is my legal opinion that you are SOL.

You guys are worried about the legislature and the governor signing law, how about the founding fathers that signed something called the Constitution. Last I checked, it protected against unreasonable searches and seizures, which this most likely was.

What I want to know TBO is whether or not the took away his driver's license and his knives.

As I said in a different post, more LEO's have been killed over the past decade in auto accidents than by firearms. That would lead me to believe that somebody could commit suicide by driving down the highway at 100+ and then entering oncoming traffic.

I think it is a bunch of BS that they confiscated this guys gun collection for 3 years. If the intent was to make sure that he did not commit suicide with the guns, I think they accomplished that. A three year cooling off period is a little much.


TBO,

You can try to defend this one on the we don't have all the facts yet, but lets assume the facts are exactly as laid out above. The LEO's responded on a tip. If you want, I'll try to get a copy of the Complaint and post it for everybody to read.

If I still had my federal Pacer ID, I could have pulled the Complaint up from the comfort of my office, but I don't do enough federal stuff nowadays to warrant having the system.