View Single Post
  #22  
Old 09-27-2005, 11:16 PM
Evan03 Evan03 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mtn Home Idaho
Posts: 1,847
"and thats not exscludeing the 270 from that list of lethal deadly weapons. and it is on my list. heck it should be. i started this hunting life with it and its done me better than good. "


"the fact is ive tried bigger and smaller and i like the smaller than 277 calibers for everything. im not pushing my opion on you just putting it out there for you and everyone else to see and think. heck maybe even learn something."


"yep. 200fps more or 100-200ft. lbs more of energy won't kill a deer, hog, bear, antelope, etc. any deader than the old tried and true. bullet drop? guess you'll just have to sight an inch or two higher at 100 yards than dead on and that's being generous to the WSM. it all seems relative. the newbies still kick, they're still THAT loud and the ammo is a bit more pricey. not worth it if ya ask me"
recoil is about identical, so close you cant tell wich is less shooting side by side in like 7.5lb rifles. I reload. therefor its cheaper at times. but not everyone does makeing this kinda for the wanting hunter who reloads.
ummmm pretty close to dead nuts on at 300 with 1.5" high at 100. ill have to check on that and post back though im not positive how much we should be reliyn on printed trajectors. or balistics. its just print on paper after all. I know first hand exsperince recently has opend my eyes on that subject.

87.8975 percent of people will shoot a 2506 243 7mm08(fullsize rifle) 257 roberts. and the like much better than the bigger 3006 cased calibers.

any way you look at the 270 is one of the best when it comes to killing deer, and other game.


im realy at a loss for words. ive got no idea what to say.

if you were closer id load up a bunch or 2506 shells and give you my 2506 for the year.

Evan
Reply With Quote