View Single Post
  #8  
Old 12-03-2005, 09:01 AM
snoopy(cda) snoopy(cda) is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: lamont, alberta
Posts: 6
i dont know...

if a better bullet is warranted (a more accurate one would be nice). the interbonds are passing through the deer, and thirty inches of solid moose is pretty impressive. i mean all we realy want is a bullet that will get inside and make a mess, right? any bullet that passes through is wasted energy, but i am a firm believer in the old saying. "it is better to have and not need, than it is to need and not have" i may have done just as well with the ballistic tips, maybe not on the moose. have you noticed we always remember the big buck that was too far to shoot, and thinkwe can overcome that with better, more powerfull, higher tech equipment. i have also noticed the ground shrinkage on the far shots tends to be more than on the close shots. O.K. now i am rambling, sorry.
Reply With Quote