|
Yeah, I'm sure there are exceptions, but the majority of magazines and editors probably fit into the mold we have described. Terrible to generalize like this, but this is why I stopped buying magazines. Same goes for cycling magazines. They rarely do good reviews of products.
What I like to see are comparison articles, because that forces them to choose one above the others. Read something like that in a cycling magazine where they were comparing 5 frames against one another. They described all the good things and bad things about each one and gave each of them a final ranking. Car magazines do this a lot too. Kind of like the best bang for the buck reviews for cars.
__________________
The pond, waterfowl, and yellow labs...it don't get any better.
|