Hunt Chat  

Go Back   Hunt Chat > Tools of the Trade > Military/Surplus Arms

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-12-2005, 07:51 PM
minte minte is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Schoharie County,NY
Posts: 0
ammunition for Garand

Could someone please help me about a question on the M-1 Garand. I just purchased 2 M-1s and was wondering if I could shoot modern 30-06 ammo in them or do I have to use military ammunition. Thank your for any assistance
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-12-2005, 10:34 PM
Jack Jack is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Georgia
Posts: 6,087
Well, yes, but.....
Remember that the ammo the Garand was configured for was at slightly lower pressure than modern factory ammo. Modern factory ammo isn't enough hotter to blow up a Garand, or anywhere near it, but I'd suspect over time the wear on the Garand mechanism would be more with modern factory ammo than with military ammo.
There are some good deals out there on military 30-06 ammo in Garand clips and bandoliers. A whole ammo can of it- 384 rounds, can be had for a really low price- and the brass is Boxer primed, so it's reloadable.
Do keep in mind some military stuff is corrosive, so, if you use the military, clean the rifle before putting it away.
Try Cheaperthandirt or Sportsman's Guide- saw one of those ammo can deals in one or the other recently.
So, I guess I'm saying you can use modern factory ammo, but military stuff is better for the gun in the long run.
__________________
“May we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion.”
Dwight D. Eisenhower
"If the freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter"
George Washington
Jack@huntchat.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-13-2005, 12:29 AM
gumpokc gumpokc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: del city okla
Posts: 892
Jack pretty much has it right.

you can fire the civie 30/06 just fine, but you may get slightly more wear and tear on her.

another thing to consider, you "may" have some problems with the civie stuff being slightly higher pressure, and slightly softer brass. this can lead to head seperations.

not saying you will, i've not heard much of the M1's having the same problems as the CETME/G3's do with military and civie brass, but it is possible.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-13-2005, 08:16 AM
Adam Helmer Adam Helmer is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Mansfield, PA
Posts: 3,865
minte,

Jack got it right. The Garand is a robust arm, but stay with 150 and 165 grain ammo at about Ball M2 pressures. Use powders in the IMR 4895 range and you will do fine. I have seen Garands with bent operating rods from too high pressures with heavy bullets and heavy, near max, loads. I know a fellow who broke several accelerators on his Garand because he had some IMR4831 and used that for near max loads with heavy bullets.

Adam
__________________
Adam Helmer
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-13-2005, 11:07 AM
Aim to maim Aim to maim is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 412
Quote:
Originally posted by Adam Helmer
minte,

I know a fellow who broke several accelerators on his Garand because he had some IMR4831 and used that for near max loads with heavy bullets.

Adam
Always good to have an opportunity to learn something new. I'm familiar with the basic components of a Garand (or thought I was). Could you enlighten me regarding the "accelerator", i.e., its appearance and function?
__________________
"The American military is like a finely crafted sword. To be effective, it must be wielded by a discerning, skilled and merciless hand."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-13-2005, 01:43 PM
Adam Helmer Adam Helmer is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Mansfield, PA
Posts: 3,865
Aim,

I just checked my NRA "Firearms Assembly" book and the part that broke was the Operating Rod Catch just where the Accelerator Pin goes through to hold the Accelerator. The Follower Rod goes through the Catch and high pressure apparently broke the Catch holding the Accelerator. I suspect there was oscillation of the Follower Rod that broke the catch due to high pressures. I replaced the catch and switching to IMR4895 solved the parts breakage problem.

Adam
__________________
Adam Helmer
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-13-2005, 07:39 PM
Aim to maim Aim to maim is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 412
Thanks for the reply. Obviously I wasn't as familiar with the Garand as I had thought. What I don't know about firearms would fill a great many large volumes.
__________________
"The American military is like a finely crafted sword. To be effective, it must be wielded by a discerning, skilled and merciless hand."
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-14-2005, 01:02 AM
Jack Jack is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Georgia
Posts: 6,087
The Garand was originally designed before there was such a thing as slow powders like 4350 or slower.
The military load used 4895 or similar, so the rifle is built to deal with powders of burning rates close to 4895.
There are many such powders-4895 is excellent. I like ball powders, so I use AA 2520 in mine- the burning rate is almost identical to 4895. Works very well.
__________________
“May we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion.”
Dwight D. Eisenhower
"If the freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter"
George Washington
Jack@huntchat.com
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-14-2005, 05:25 PM
Gil Martin Gil Martin is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Schnecksville, PA
Posts: 2,908
Good points, all

The problem in using factory ammo in an M1 Garand is what we do not know what powder was used to load it. Powders such as IMR4895 and IMR4064 are just fine with sensible loads. Factory ammo may have IMR4350 or IMR4831-type powders and therein lies the problem. I would shoot military ball ammo or reloads.

Just a comment regarding the CETME. I have one and shoot it with reloads. The extraction is violent and commercial brass has worked just fine with moderate loads. All the best...
Gil
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-14-2005, 06:58 PM
gumpokc gumpokc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: del city okla
Posts: 892
Your right Gil, moderate loads with commercial brass should be ok, it's just some people aren't aware of the fact that alot of older semi-auto militry rifles, will rip heads off commerical brass, _if_ it is loaded to higher pressures.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-14-2005, 07:01 PM
BILLY D.'s Avatar
BILLY D. BILLY D. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MINOT (MINDROT) ND
Posts: 1,498
i faced this conundrum when i first purchased my m-1. so i said the heck with it bought 500 rounds of brass and the other assorted and sundry stuff and rolled my own. now i don't have to worry.

47.2 grs of 4064 and 168 bthpm puts me on the target at 200 meters and that ain't toooooo bad for an old guy with glaucoma, and thats with iron sights.
__________________
HAPPY TRAILS

BILL

NRA LIFE MEMBER 1965
DAV
IHMSA
JPFO-LIFE MEMBER

"THE" THREAD KILLER

IT' OK.....I'VE STARTED UP MY MEDS AGAIN. THEY SHOULD TAKE EFFECT IN ABOUT A WEEK. (STACI-2006)

HANDLOADS ARE LIKE UNDERWEAR...BE CAREFUL WHO YOU SWAP WITH.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.