Hunt Chat  

Go Back   Hunt Chat > Tools of the Trade > Rifles

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-03-2005, 10:58 AM
hofts hofts is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: sioux falls sd
Posts: 276
anyone ruined a barrel with sweets or other?

just curious if anyone has ruined a barrel while cleaning with any form of cleaner.
thanks


i have left sweets in for over 30 minutes before, i don't have a bore scope so i don't know if i have any damage, but i sure can't tell so far. it looks great and shoots great. will 30 minutes with sweets ruin a barrel or not. i did of course follow with large amount of hoppes to (neutralize) it or so i thought.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-10-2005, 12:44 AM
Cal Sibley Cal Sibley is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,389
No, I haven't ruined a barrel or even damaged a stock using copper remover, but I do try to be careful. Most of the copper removers like Sweets and Barnes contain ammonia so you want to take pains to get it all out before you put the rifle away. I've taken to using Kroil because of it's deep penetrating ability. It seems to neutralize any remainig amonia nicely. I protect the stock by placing a fairly thick rag over the stock right behind the action. Best wishes.

Cal - Montreal
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-10-2005, 01:48 PM
MarkL MarkL is offline
Dis-Membered
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 388
I've seen the warnings about not leaving it in more than 15 minutes or whatever, but it just doesn't make sense to me. Suppose I leave it in for 15, swab it out, apply it again for 15, and repeat a third time. That's 45 minutes of cumulative exposure. How is that any better than leaving the first application in for 45 minutes?

If you use Sweets every time you clean your rifle, you will eventually have many hours of cumulative exposure. If one application is going to corrode your bore in, say, one hour, why doesn't multiple applications have the same effect?

Does Sweet's undergo some kind of change after it has been applied that causes it to beome corrosive? Maybe it absorbs moisture from the air and turns to acid? I should would like a chemist to explain what is supposed to be happening.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-10-2005, 01:56 PM
hofts hofts is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: sioux falls sd
Posts: 276
good points

i've also pondered those same thoughts!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-10-2005, 04:54 PM
denton denton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: layton, ut
Posts: 490
Quote:
Does Sweet's undergo some kind of change after it has been applied that causes it to beome corrosive?
The short answer is yes, it does...well, sort of.

You can make a very close substitute for Sweet's by mixing 2/3 janitorial strength ammonia (10%) and 1/3 thick, liquid detergent.

Ammonia is a base. Normally (some exceptions...ammonia attacks copper) a base will protect metal, as opposed to an acid which will eat metal. Some of the lubricants used on large rotating machines are so full of strong base that they will peel your skin and flesh off.

The problem with ammonia is that the ammonia gas evaporates out, leaving plain water. Water, of course, promotes rust.

The other problem is that copper in a barrel acts as "reverse galvanizing". Where zinc will protect steel, copper does the opposite, and promotes pitting and corrosion. Leaving water in the barrel forms a battery, with copper and steel, and promotes the pitting.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-10-2005, 06:25 PM
BILLY D.'s Avatar
BILLY D. BILLY D. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MINOT (MINDROT) ND
Posts: 1,498
Quote:
Originally posted by denton
The short answer is yes, it does...well, sort of.

You can make a very close substitute for Sweet's by mixing 2/3 janitorial strength ammonia (10%) and 1/3 thick, liquid detergent.

Ammonia is a base. Normally (some exceptions...ammonia attacks copper) a base will protect metal, as opposed to an acid which will eat metal. Some of the lubricants used on large rotating machines are so full of strong base that they will peel your skin and flesh off.

The problem with ammonia is that the ammonia gas evaporates out, leaving plain water. Water, of course, promotes rust.

The other problem is that copper in a barrel acts as "reverse galvanizing". Where zinc will protect steel, copper does the opposite, and promotes pitting and corrosion. Leaving water in the barrel forms a battery, with copper and steel, and promotes the pitting.
gee denton

that made everything perfectly clear. another words i'm damned if i do or damned if i don't.

personally i'll keep using ammonia cleaners, i feel perfectly safe in doing so. just don't tell anybody else ok?
__________________
HAPPY TRAILS

BILL

NRA LIFE MEMBER 1965
DAV
IHMSA
JPFO-LIFE MEMBER

"THE" THREAD KILLER

IT' OK.....I'VE STARTED UP MY MEDS AGAIN. THEY SHOULD TAKE EFFECT IN ABOUT A WEEK. (STACI-2006)

HANDLOADS ARE LIKE UNDERWEAR...BE CAREFUL WHO YOU SWAP WITH.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-16-2005, 07:32 PM
Cal Sibley Cal Sibley is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,389
I use Sweets after every range session in some of my copper fouling rifles, but follow it with a rather liberal application of Kroil. It really gets down in the barrel imperfections to raise other ingredients up. Maybe I've just been lucky so far. I've noticed with Kroil that when applied to what appears to be a clean barrel it will give me dark, patches with fouling on them. I guess it penetrates deeper than the other products I use, but I am leery of Sweets. Best wishes.

Cal - Montreal
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.