|
|
#16
06-14-2006, 06:33 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Good points Skeet. I'll have to look up the actual requirements of citizenship in the US. Won't be doing it anytime soon though because I am heading to New York for an extended weekend. I'll try to revisit this thread when I get back, along with reading some of the case law on wolves out west. This board gives me more legal questions than my clients, but you know me, I hate having questions unanswered.
__________________
The pond, waterfowl, and yellow labs...it don't get any better. 
|
|
#17
06-14-2006, 06:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Skeet,
I have no idea where you are getting your information, but it is incorrect. All children born on U.S. soil are automatically U.S. citizens from the moment of birth, regardless of the immigration status of their parents. The only exceptions are the children of certain foreign diplomatic personnel posted to the U.S. California has nothing to do with it. It is Federal law, pursuant to current Federal court interpretation of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. I wish it were not the case, but it is. 
__________________
"The American military is like a finely crafted sword. To be effective, it must be wielded by a discerning, skilled and merciless hand."
|
|
#18
06-15-2006, 02:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Did any of you see the clip about the conjoined babies born here? How did they say it? The parents were here on some kind of visa and she just happened to go into labor here! Yea right, now you know you are paying for those babies to be separated. I don't have a problem so much as I do with the fact she made sure she was on US soil when she went into labor....and they are blowing smoke up your you know what saying it was a coincidence...
__________________
nothing like the smell of chanel and gunpowder in the morning
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
