skeeter@ccia.com, I think it will be necessary to get a constitutional attorney to look at the wording of the 2nd Amendment. It is the only amendment that says the right of the people to keep and bear arms "shall not be infringed". If you are not allowed to buy ammunition, I would surmize you right is being seriously "infringed". This wording in not found anywhere else in the constitution or amendments. I feel it is more significant than has been admitted. This supreme court is more likely than most to find that a serious infringement has occurred. Of course someone who has been affected has to start the process through the court system. That can only occur after the SCOTUS has dealt with the question of whether or not the amendments covers the individual states. I again would opinion that it does since the states had to ratify the amendments. Why would they have to do that if they weren't affected? Maybe a lawyer would like to comment on what I have put forth.
01-31-2010, 12:22 PM
Threaded Mode