![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i saw in todays news the lawyers for washington DC's anti-gun ban loss are presenting the argument the second amendment pertains ONLY to the federal govenment, NOT the fifty states and washington DC.
that is an extremely dangerous argument. it sounds like they want to exclude the constitution to private citizens leaving the private citizen to the whim of the states or maybe just the second amendment? meaning that section does not apply to the private citizen? some states, like california, DO NOT have the right to own firearms in their constitution. that could spell disaster for us here in california. they would pass a law saying no one but police and active military may posses ANY sort of firearm. we need to keep a VERY close eye on our legislators and lawyers! if their assault against the second amendment is successful, which amendment will be targeted next?
__________________
If you find yourself going thru hell, keep on going, don't stop. |
|
|