Hunt Chat  

Go Back   Hunt Chat > Tools of the Trade > Gear and Gadgets

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 09-17-2009, 06:41 PM
petey's Avatar
petey petey is offline
Owner/Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: "Pitch Pine", PA
Posts: 65,793
The $50 Digital Trail Cam!

Before I left for a family vacation to Disney World a couple weeks ago I had to run over to Walmart and pick up a few essentials for the trip. Now I'll be the first to say I hate Walmart, but as I was walking past the sporting good section I saw a big $50 sign and a bunch of trail cameras hanging below the sign. That caught my attention so I walked on over and grabbed one to look at it. It was a Wildgame Innovations 1.3MP...I figured heck 1.3 Mega-Pixels..this thing's a piece of crap so I kept on walking. The next day I was talking to a buddy at work and guess what? He bought one and said he put it out the night before. He told me he would have pictures to show me the quality by the time I got back from vacation.

So a week later, I'm back and he said, "Hey I got those pictures for ya!" So he brought in his SD card and we brought the pictures up on my laptop. I then brought up the pictures from my 4MP Moultree Flash camera....The Wildgame Innovations had a better picture quality! So that got me to thinking...how can that be? 1.3 MP better than 4 MP on BEST quality? I always wondered as my Sony Sybershot set at 3.2MP takes about a 2.5MB sized picture and the moultree is spitting out pictures about 700KB.

Definitely the lense or something, b/c that day I went out and picked up 2 of the WI 3.1MP cameras. I figured $50, what the heck. I'm more apt to put that out there and it won't hurt too much if it gets stolen. Not like a $300 camera anyhow. Case in point I guess...just b.c they are spouting off like 4,5,even 7 MP game cameras, it doesn't mean you're gonna get the quality.

BTW, here's a pic of the new camera at 1.3MP (me in the Disney Shirt) and a pic taken about 100 yards away with the Moutree.

Downfalls to the 1.3?
No burst of pictures, it only takes 1 pic every 30, 45 sec, 1 min or 2 min
Trigger speed is descent, but not the fastest
Takes c-Cell batteries, so no clue of the lifespan
Also takes 3, 1.2V watch batteries for the date/time
Only handles 2GB SD card, which ends up being like 2000 or so odd pics

Anyone else see this deal and bite on it? Your opinions on this cost effective camera?

Here's the camera http://www.wildgameinnovations.com/products/s2.html
except it's a S1.3 instead of the S2.0
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC_0001.JPG (316.4 KB, 496 views)
File Type: jpg MDGC0076.jpg (569.5 KB, 504 views)
__________________

Perfect Practice Makes Perfect
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.