270 too light for mule deer

[PJgunner]

Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe that idiot was Lee J. Hoots. I read the article and while I'm not a great big fan of the .270 Win., I have used one enough to know he's full of a lot of smelly brown stuff. Right now I have four rifles in .270. Somehow they just seem to sneak into the gun safe when I'm not looking. I even took one out into the light of day last August and then slew a nice antelope, a part of which will be on my dinner table.
I have no idea what kind of whacky weed he was smoking when he wrote that article, but from now on anything of his I read will be read with a very jaundiced eye. I figure he dosn't know his butt from a hole in the ground and which would be the more useful. But then, there's a few more gun writers I feel that way about.
The one tht gets me the most is when some hack writes about the new 29 Tornado and says it MOA to 800 yards and the rifle is so well built it looks like a very expensive custom. So I run out and buy one and at 100 yards I'm lucky to get a 4" group, no matter what I do or try. I write the gun rag about my problem and get the standard, "Mr. Gunwriter has been shooting for many years and has learned many tricks to get the utmost accuracy from any rifle." Strange seeing that I was at least 20 years older than "Mr. Gunwriter" and was shooting long before he was even a gleam in his daddy's eye. I didn't get a response on that one.
I've even had the pleasure and sometimes displeasure of meeting some of the writers and in a couple of cases, they were total snobs. Others were perfect gentlemen. One, no longer with us as so rude that my wife who as with me at the time actually said a swear word, and she never swears. There are a few of he late greats I would have liked to meet. Never had the chance, more's he pity. There are a few I would like to meet as well that are still among the living. Whether that happens or not? Who knows?
Paul B.