Hunt Chat  

Go Back   Hunt Chat > Tools of the Trade > Reloading Bench

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8  
Old 05-22-2006, 02:14 PM
bsterns bsterns is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: South Texas
Posts: 80
RL 19 load

Cariboo, I loaded up the maximum #13 Speer reloading manual's RL-19 compressed load of 61gr. with the Sierra 250gr. BTSPs. I shot 6 into a 7/8" group. The group was a near perfect circle. The case showed no signs of pressure except for a flattened primer. No raised edge on the primer firing pin mark. That is really accurate for my hunting purposes. I believe I will keep that load. I used necked up 30-06 winchester cases with Remington 9 1/2 large rifle primers.
Using the data from the Speer's manual for 338-06, 250gr. the muz. vel. is 2531 fps with 61gr. RL-19. The data for 338 win. mag. 250gr. shows a muz. vel. of 2664 using 72gr. of RL 19. That is a lot of extra recoil from an increase from 61gr. to 72gr. of powder.
Using the Sierra bullet in the 338-06 and Speer's GrandSlam in the 338 Win. Mag. I compared the two trajectories and overall performance short of expandability. I put the data into the ballistics program on RealGuns.com. One remarkable thing is that the trajectory out to 300 yds is only about half an inch difference in a 5 inch channel (2.4" high at 100 yds) and virtually no difference out to 225 yds. The even more remarkable difference is that the Sierra bullet from the 338-06 due to its greater ballistic coefficient, though slower, has slightly higher velocity and higher ft-lbs of energy at 300yds than the GrandSlam bullet from the 338 winchester magnum.
__________________
Reloadnbob
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.