Hunt Chat  

Go Back   Hunt Chat > Tools of the Trade > Reloading Bench

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-06-2005, 04:40 PM
razmuz razmuz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 261
Question Barnes (xlc) Coating

I know Barnes bullets are a little much for deer, but I'll use anything to cut back on cleaning time. Does the XLC coating really work? Will it gum up your barrel? Will the Triple-X shoot just as clean?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-06-2005, 05:09 PM
Rocky Raab's Avatar
Rocky Raab Rocky Raab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ogden, Utah
Posts: 8,705
Some guys like the XLC bullets and some don't. Same for some guns - some won't shoot them for beans, others do.

Personally, I'd go with the uncoated ones, and I'd get the Triple-X kind first.

Reports of the Triple-X bullets are almost all good.
__________________
Freedom of the Press
Does NOT mean the right to lie!

Visit me at my Reloading Room webpage!

Get signed copies of my Vietnam novels at "Baggy Zero Four" "Mike Five Eight"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-06-2005, 05:40 PM
Varmint Hunter Varmint Hunter is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 194
Over the years I've experimented with a lot of X bullets. They all gave me plenty of reason to complain. That is until the TSX bullets arrived. The TSX has been relatively easy to get to shoot well in several of my rifles and definately leaves less copper in the bore.

They still get copper fouled but not as heavily. If you plan on shooting X bullets I'd suggest buying a bottle of Barnes CR-10. They go hand in hand.

By the way, I have shot many whitetails with the X bullets. I get total penetration but don't consider them to be "too much for deer". Some guys like them because you can eat right up to the bullet hole - so to speak.

VH
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-06-2005, 07:29 PM
fabsroman's Avatar
fabsroman fabsroman is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 7,823
I use the XLC's in my .300 Win Mag because it likes them and it does pretty well with them on deer. I have had some exit holes that have been pretty sizeable, and others that have been rather small, but the damage inside the deer is incredible.

As far as accuracy is concerned, Rocky is right. The .300 Win Mag Ruger MKII loves them, but the older .270 Win Remington 700 (probably over 30 years old) and the Savage Model 110 .30-06 (definitely over 35 years old don't like them at all. The .270 was horrible.

As far as cleanup is concerned, really haven't noticed too much of a difference.
__________________
The pond, waterfowl, and yellow labs...it don't get any better.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-07-2005, 10:35 AM
Cossack Cossack is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Detroit Lakes, MN
Posts: 226
TSX

The TSX shoots as accurately, is less fussy (no coating to rub off) penetrates the same and takes less powder to reach the same velocity. As for "too much for deer," what constitutes enough? The point at which you stop losing wounded deer but may have to shoot more than once? Id say 17 one-shot kills, not one lost animal - not even the need to trail one more than 50 yards - using Barnes X and TSX, in multiple calibers, speaks for itself.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-07-2005, 10:38 AM
Cossack Cossack is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Detroit Lakes, MN
Posts: 226
PS

If you don't like to clean, use 'em for hunting not general shooting. How much does it take to clean up after one shot?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.