![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
O.k., just for the sake of argument.....
I've always liked the "look" of the Colt combat commander series (not really sure why), but does 3/4" of barrel length really make that big a difference, and if you carry "cocked and locked", does a round hammer really make a difference than one that is spurred? Heard it was so that the 'round' hammer didn't catch on clothing, but if it's already at full cock....... I'd be interested in hearing opinions from everyone, but especially those who have carried both.... Thanks in advance.............
__________________
If your dog thinks that your the greatest, don't go seeking a second opinion! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Mr. 16 gauge,
I never found the issue M1911 unhandy to carry concealed. I just shoved it into my weak side belt and zipped up my sleeveless vest or pulled on a sweater. The bobbed (round) hammer question comes up when folks talk about drawing from a coat pocket. I agree with you, since it is locked and cocked, why draw it? I fired my Commander and a PPK .380 from inside the coat pocket and merely replaced the coat. Duh! Adam
__________________
Adam Helmer |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I have had and carried the Commander for over 25 years. I dont know that the full size would be any harder to carry or draw. For me it was the look of the gun that sold me. I had wanted a 1911 since I saw my grandfathers at a young age. To me, the shorter barrel made the gun look more balanced. I have shot both and found no real difference. When I saw the "Bright Nickel" I had to have it. Also makes it easy to clean.
Allen |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
While I have my 1911's, had a Commander many moons back. I liked it and shot it well. Wish I still had it!
Dan
__________________
Lifes not meant to be a journey to the grave with the intentions of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thouroughly used up, totally wore out,loudly proclaiming.... WOW.....WHAT A RIDE....... |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
3/4" does not make that much of a difference for me.
But, when I do get another 1911, it'll be a lightweight alloy-style Commander. For me, the rounded hammer along with an extended beavertail prevents hammer bite (unlike the standard hammer). My 1991 Govt had the traditional hammer and beavertail. It got switched out to a Wilson skeletonized hammer and high ride beavertail shortly after purchase. The original hammer did not hinder drawing from a hip or IWB holster. Not sure how it would because if you carry it correctly (cocked and locked), the hammer isn't sticking up to snag on clothing. I'll never buy another 1911 unless it has the extended beavertail and round hammer.
__________________
Member: The Red Mist Culture |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I have both and I've carried both. The only bad thung I can say about the Combat Commander is that S.O.B. will chew a hole in the web of your hand in short order.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Carrying heavy handguns on my hip have aggravated the back quite badly ever since. Still, I really would prefer my CC. ![]() Paul B. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I have an old Colt LW Commander with a couple of modifications that is my farvorite 1911. Added a beavertaill grip safety and an extended slide release. Lately I had to put on a set of fiber optic sights, old eyes. Very good shooter and carries well. Love my full sized 1911s but darn it all they are heavy to carry, years ago carried them all the time and no complaint.
__________________
VFW Life Member, NRA Life Member, Wisconsin Conservation Warden Assoc. Life Member, Wisconsin Waterfowl Assoc. Life Member |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
what about maybe looking for a used or like new sa compact.
i just picked one up and love it. i can actualy hit things like rabbits with it. it has millet sites that work very well exstended beaver tail safety exstended thumb safety and trigger. this little thing just works for me ![]() ![]() small gun with big sites ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|