|
|
#16
05-02-2007, 03:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bill, You might want to give BSA a call....I think that they have a good warranty on their scopes. They may just rebuild/replace it for you.
Just a thought. Tall Shadow (ETA: All Your Page 2 Are Belong To Me) 
|
|
#17
05-02-2007, 03:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Catfish,
BY today's standard, you are pretty rich. I have retired people as clients with mortgages on their homes and barely enough retirement income to cover the mortgage. It drives me utterly nuts.
__________________
The pond, waterfowl, and yellow labs...it don't get any better.
|
|
#18
05-02-2007, 07:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Got a few 4 power Swift pistol scopes on contender barrels and while the optical quality is far from camera quality ,they have held up well on .35 rem and 45-70 barrels. Could well be the 2 sets of scope rings on a weaver rail that helps a bunch. A trick i got from a ram and pig shooter and fellow contender nut.
Had the first one since about 1990 and many thousand 35 rem rounds have gone down the end and never had a problem staying on target. I sight in and build some deer slug guns, I have seen many a cheap tasco (Vintage Wallmart) nearly explode inside from the recoil. 39.99 at wall mart just don't cut it on a 7 pound 12 guage slug gun sending 300 grains at 1500 FPS +. Since having good luck with Swift in the past have been recommending swifts 1.5-4X32 for about 150 bucks to those who ask my opinion on a cheap deer slug scope. have yet to send back one. Still a bsa illuminated 3X9X40 at a cheap price will sell well. On a 223 shot twice a year will last the normal gun buyer years.
__________________
I don't know but I've been told it's hard to swim with the weight of gold. On the other hand I have heard it said it's just as hard with the weight of lead.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
