Hunt Chat  

Go Back   Hunt Chat > Tools of the Trade > Traditional Muzzleloaders

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #27  
Old 06-01-2007, 05:09 PM
Adam Helmer Adam Helmer is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Mansfield, PA
Posts: 3,865
skeet,

I was at a meeting a while back and a bowhunter organization guy started speaking about why crossbows require being classified with muzzleloaders. He went on about how there was NO similiarity with compounds, recurves, etc. and thus crossbows should be listed with muzzleloaders.

An old guy stood up and asked if the crossbows use a #209 cap or a #11 cap or 5 grains of 4F priming powder in their "pans", being muzzleloaders and all? The entire room burst out laughing and the bow guy did not reply.

I think there IS a difference between muzzleloaders. Yes, all load from the muzzle, but a day in hard rain with a flintlock is far less reliable for the shot than a #11 cap or a #209 shotgun primer in a closed-bolt inline. I have hunted with them all and have an opinion on which is the more reliable in inclement weather.

Adam
__________________
Adam Helmer
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.