|
|
|
|
#1
09-08-2011, 12:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Or how about a whole bunch more welfare/crack babies who would create an even larger more telling drag on our economy.. No not arguing.. Just stating a possibility.... as in the above post. The only problem I have with religion making the decisions is this.. All life is considered sacred from conception..except in the case of rape or child melestations etc etc.. No matter what..if one (human) life is sacred..then all(human) life should be. Not arguing again.. but there is a double standard there some way. I just probably don't understand..as a Catholic Priest said.. He was a very good man and a good friend.
__________________
skeet@huntchat.com Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" Benjamin Franklin 
|
|
#2
09-08-2011, 05:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
As is so often the case, follow the money. I can have strong feelings one way or the other, but if it is a private decision for the woman, why is always the cost factor brought up. A lot of babies could survive in a loving home, if carried to term and given up for adoption. The vast majority of abortions have nothing to do with crack, or deformity, just pressure related to some money. My grand daughter was born with a deformity, cleft palate, not the lip, now at age 3 she is a totally fine little girl.
__________________
Born twice,die once!
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
