Hunt Chat  

Go Back   Hunt Chat > All Things HC > Almost Anything Goes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-02-2005, 09:11 AM
M.T. Pockets's Avatar
M.T. Pockets M.T. Pockets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,209
Senator Kennedy - need to vent

Just need to vent a little about Senator Kennedy and his opposition to President Bush's selection for Attorney General.

He was on the news talking about Mr. Gonzalez and his inability to remember "horrid details" of how the US is treating captured prisoners. How the US is treating prisoners is one issue, but for him to accuse anyone else of having a poor memory, or attempting to cover anything up seems like a bit of double speak.

I'm too young to remember the details of Senator Kennedy's infamous attempt to float an Oldsmobile, but didn't he claim he couldn't remember the details immediately afterwards ? Isn't that why he didn't get around to calling EMS, or even reporting it to the police til several hours later ?

The way he treated Ms. Rice was another issue entirely. He doesn't realize that his disapproval will only increase her approval rating on a national basis.

He is a walking, talking, classic posterboy for term limits.
__________________
"Watch your top knot."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-02-2005, 10:36 AM
Tall Shadow Tall Shadow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 282
Re: Senator Kennedy - need to vent

Quote:
Originally posted by M.T. Pockets
Just need to vent a little about Senator Kennedy and his opposition to President Bush's selection for Attorney General.

He was on the news talking about Mr. Gonzalez and his inability to remember "horrid details" of how the US is treating captured prisoners. How the US is treating prisoners is one issue, but for him to accuse anyone else of having a poor memory, or attempting to cover anything up seems like a bit of double speak.

I'm too young to remember the details of Senator Kennedy's infamous attempt to float an Oldsmobile, but didn't he claim he couldn't remember the details immediately afterwards ? Isn't that why he didn't get around to calling EMS, or even reporting it to the police til several hours later ?

The way he treated Ms. Rice was another issue entirely. He doesn't realize that his disapproval will only increase her approval rating on a national basis.

He is a walking, talking, classic posterboy for term limits.
That and fetal alcohol syndrome (babies born with enlarged heads, due to their mothers excessive drinking during pregnancy.)

His district must be some kind of s--t hole, with raving morons, to keep electing him. Like the Levin brothers we have here in Michigan. It disgusts me.

Tall Shadow
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-02-2005, 12:49 PM
Virginiashadow Virginiashadow is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Nokesville, VA
Posts: 487
He is one of my most unfavorite politicians of all time...he killed a woman, got no jail time and now serves a basically communist state of Massachusetts.

vashadpw
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-02-2005, 03:07 PM
Critch Critch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Southeast Missouri
Posts: 238
The Hero of Chappquidick!
__________________
I cried because I had no shoes, till I met a man who had no feet....so I asked him, "Can I have your shoes? You aren't using them."

"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." --Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-02-2005, 11:13 PM
Valigator Valigator is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 1,871
Senator Kennedy is the definition of special interest groups ...he is bought and payed for and wrapped up in a pretty little ribbon for the state...He has two bothers whose legacy is they lost their lives in the name of public service and he will milk that till he is over-run...Senator Kennedy unlike other less reknowned Senators is known for being a no-good useless S.O.B. some guys just arent that famous yet...but give them time...
__________________
nothing like the smell of chanel and gunpowder in the morning
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-03-2005, 08:44 PM
PJgunner PJgunner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 929
Well, as much as I dislike Kennedy and the rest of his liberal buddies, for once I agree that Alberto Gonzoles should not have been confirmed as Attorney General.
Before you all start lighting the pilot lights on your flame throwers, Mr. Gonzoles has stated that he will push for the reinstatement of the assault weapons ban. As far as I am concerned, he should be run out on a rail, tarred and feathers and forced to go back from whence he came. I'll even provide the flat rock.
Paul B.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-03-2005, 09:03 PM
DogYeller's Avatar
DogYeller DogYeller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 567
PJgunner

Would you care to enlighten me? I can't find anything.
__________________
The first ammendment provides for freedom of speech, not freedom from consequences.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-03-2005, 11:00 PM
PJgunner PJgunner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 929
Dog Yeller. I sent you the following as an E-mail as well as posting it here. Unfortunately, he got confirmed today.
Paul B.

AG-nominee Backs Semi-auto Ban
-- Gonzales tells Senate he supports gun control

Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org

Tuesday, January 25, 2005


Testifying before the U.S. Senate last week, Alberto Gonzales
announced he supports President Bush's position on the semi-auto ban.

"The president has made it clear that he stands ready to sign a
reauthorization of the federal assault weapons ban if it is sent to
him by Congress," Gonzales said. "I, of course, support the
president on this issue."

While some might be tempted to give Gonzales a "pass" since he was
parroting his boss' position, Gonzales went even further, indicating
that gun control was a heart-felt position of his own.

He spoke of his brother, who is a Houston SWAT officer, and said, "I
worry about his safety and the types of weapons he will confront on
the street." Hence, he supports a prohibition on semi-automatics
that, in truth, only amounts to a ban on ugly guns.

GOA activists are certainly aware of the fact that President Bush has
repeatedly trumpeted his support for the Clinton semi-auto ban which
expired last September. But every time Bush has opened his mouth on
this issue, GOA activists have led the way in bombarding the White
House.

And that is why it is VERY important that gun rights supporters take
the President to the "political woodshed" once again. No, we
probably won't change his mind on this issue. But if we barrage his
office with phone calls, faxes and e-mails, it is very possible that
we will increase his reluctance to push the ban.

Most likely, our stiff opposition in the past has already
accomplished this. A frequent complaint during the campaign last
year was that Bush was doing very little to press Congressional
Republicans to send him gun ban legislation.

Remember the third presidential debate last year? Bush was asked,
"You said if Congress would vote to extend the ban on assault
weapons, that you'd sign the legislation, but you did nothing to
encourage Congress to extend it."

Yes, maybe Bush was trying to have it both ways. But your outspoken
opposition to the ban has certainly not hurt our efforts to restrain
the President from pushing it.

So please make sure you contact President Bush. While some might
think that an anti-gun Attorney General is limited in the amount of
damage he can inflict upon the Second Amendment, we can be sure that
his position on critical court cases could affect our gun rights for
generations to come.

Remember that it was former Attorney General, John Ashcroft, who
opposed us on the important Emerson case that came before the Supreme
Court not too long ago. A Fifth Circuit District Court had initially
ruled in favor of Second Amendment rights, arguing that a federal gun
statute was unconstitutional -- the law disarmed citizens who were
not guilty of any crime or had not been convicted by any jury. After
the Appeals Court reversed the decision, Dr. Emerson appealed to the
Supreme Court.

While the Supremes refused to hear the case, gun owners did not fail
notice that General Ashcroft was in full support of how the Emerson
case was ultimately decided -- thus, putting him in total support of
the federal gun restrictions.

Not only that, but the Ashcroft-led Justice Department also opposed
gun owners in the Silveira semi-auto ban case and the Lamar Bean
case.

All of this to say, it is imperative that we speak out once again --
if for no other reason than to remind President Bush there are
millions of gun owners that he, and his party, cannot afford to take
for granted.

ACTION: Please contact President Bush and express your outrage that
he would nominate an Attorney General who supports a federal ban on
semi-automatic firearms.

You can visit the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at
http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send a pre-written e-mail
message to President Bush. To call or snail mail the President
regarding the semi-auto ban, you can use the following contact info:

President George Bush
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500
Fax: 202-456-2461 or 202-456-1907
Phone: 202-456-1414

----- Pre-written letter -----

Dear President Bush:

I am very disappointed that you would nominate an anti-gun Attorney
General such as Alberto Gonzales. He supports the Clinton ban on
semi-automatic firearms, and I think that's a travesty.

Please realize that you were reelected President, in large part,
because gun owners opposed the cockeyed positions of your opponent.
I would expect to see a bigger difference between the two of you when
it comes to Second Amendment issues.

In the future, I hope you will use the Second Amendment as a litmus
test in nominating candidates who oppose gun control when filling
important administrative and judicial positions.

Thank you.

Sincerely,


****************************

Help Defend the Second Amendment Every Time You Place a Long Distance
Call

Gun Owners of America is in Washington fighting for the Bill of
Rights and your Second Amendment freedoms every day.

And you can help GOA every day as well -- or at least as often as you
make a long distance phone call.

GOA has partnered with LifeLine -- a conservative, pro-gun long
distance provider that gives 10% of your monthly long distance bill
to GOA.

LifeLine is NOT affiliated with any anti-gun telephone companies such
as MCI, Sprint or AT&T -- all companies which support anti-gun
candidates.

LifeLine's newest 2.9 cent Savings Plan offers you the lowest
long-distance rate available that directly supports the organization
of your choice. For only $4.95 per month, you can get up to 500
minutes of long-distance at one of the lowest rates available today.

And for as little as $49.95 per month, LifeLine Unlimited gives you
the freedom to call virtually anyone in the USA, at any time, without
ever watching the clock! Plus, get local phone service and all of
your favorite calling features; all on one bill, and all for one low
price per month.

You can help yourself and help GOA by using LifeLine. Call their
toll free number and find out which plan will work best for you.
That number is 1-800-800-7550. Or, go to
http://www.lifeline.net/index_goa.cfm to sign up via the web.


****************************
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-04-2005, 08:48 AM
M.T. Pockets's Avatar
M.T. Pockets M.T. Pockets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,209
PJ, I never heard anything about Gonzales from the NRA. Nothing at all. I'm not saying that I'm doubting Gun Owners of America, I just think it's odd I didn't hear anything, if they did - I missed it.
__________________
"Watch your top knot."
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-04-2005, 02:47 PM
Tall Shadow Tall Shadow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 282
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally posted by M.T. Pockets
PJ, I never heard anything about Gonzales from the NRA. Nothing at all. I'm not saying that I'm doubting Gun Owners of America, I just think it's odd I didn't hear anything, if they did - I missed it.
The NRA, while the largest, strongest and most widely known firearms group, has not been standing up for our shooting & hunting rights. Too many times they have sacrificed one segment of our community in order to move another part of their agenda forward. Often they have pitted one segment against another. You only need to look to the Shotgunner vs. "Evil Black Rifle"(Ar-15) crowds to see what I'm talking about.

Their lack of support, Overly P.C. policies, often to the point of bad mouthing by local/national NRA representatives, has cost this community dearly. (The lack of information provided about Gonzales from the NRA is a GREAT example!)

We are ALL in this together!

Segmenting ourselves in to smaller, self serving sub-groups only helps the Anti-gunners succeed that much easier.

Tall Shadow
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.