Hunt Chat  

Go Back   Hunt Chat > Tools of the Trade > Optics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-23-2006, 03:23 PM
45-70 45-70 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4
Leo VX11 vs VX111

I'm a new member(1st posting), having visited often in the past and learned alot from Huntchat. I just bought a VX11 2-7x33 for my 45-70 Guide Gun. This was my 1st Leo, based mainly on advice from the Optics Forum!. You guys were all correct about the optics on the Leo, its amazing.

I need some advice on a Leo VX11 or VX111 3-9x40 for my Ruger MK1 7mmMag. It is an accurate favorite of mine with an old Weaver scope on it that I want to upgrade.

So, 1st question: is there an appreciable clarity/light gathering difference between the 33 bell on the VX11 and the 36 or 40 bell in a VX111.
2nd question: is the 56% price differential of $300(VX11) vs $470(VX111) is worth it?

Thanks in advance.
"An Ole Miss Rebel lost in NH"
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-26-2006, 12:40 PM
Dan in the Delta Dan in the Delta is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Olive Branch, MS, USA
Posts: 43
From one Ole Miss Rebel to another, I'd have to say the VX-II 3-9x40 is a much better buy than the VX-III version. I've got a VX-II 3-9x40 on my pre-'64 Model 70 .30-06 and really like it. I just don't think you get much if anything more with the VX-III.

Now if you want a scope that's better than both and comparable to the VX-III in price, then take a look at the Zeiss Conquest. I've got a few of these and in my opinion they're a better scope than the VX-III, a scope I've owned and have experience with also. I think the Zeiss Conquest 3-9x40 is about as good as it gets in the mid-level price range. I've had one mounted on a .300 Weatherby Sako for about 5 years and it has endured a lot of rough handling and upwards of 900 rounds of ammo and hasn't given me one bit of trouble. I'm continually impressed by its sharp optical performance. I've got another 3-9x40 Conquest mounted on a 7mm Rem Mag Sako and it too is an excellent, excellent scope.

Hope this was of some assistance.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-29-2006, 08:02 PM
Catfish Catfish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oh.
Posts: 1,607
I don`t think Leupold makes a 3 x 9 VX-lll. When you go to to the VX-lll it`s a 3.5 to 10. There is a differance but wether or not it1s worth the extra money only you can make that desion. I`ve got just over 30 Leupold scopes, bought my first one in 1968 and have collected them ever since. I buy them at gun shows used now as I have 9 of them in boxes waiting for a gun to go on. You won`t go wrong with any Leupold and for a hunting rifle a 3 x 9 or a 3.5 x 10 is an excellant choice. If getting a VX-ll will strap you for cash get the VX-ll, if not get the lll.
__________________
Catfish
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-12-2006, 01:08 PM
45-70 45-70 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4
Thanks guys, I'm going for the VXIII. I've convinced myself that my Ruger deserves the better glass. BTW my VXII/Marlin 45-70 groups at 2 bullet diameters at 75yds from a bench rest. Not too shabby for commercial ammo and a 18" barrel. Allows a head shot as far as I would normally try to throw a brick as big as the 45-70 round. NH deer will fear me now!(if I actually see one this year)

"An Ole Miss Rebel lost in NH"
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.