Hunt Chat  

Go Back   Hunt Chat > Tools of the Trade > Optics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-03-2006, 12:14 PM
Big joe Big joe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Utah
Posts: 119
Best Scope Under...

O.K.... Just curious and I want to tap the great wisdom and experience in this room! Give me your opinion and why ???

Best aproximately 3X9X40 scope

under $200.00

under $350.00

under $500.00


Thanks in advance for your comments
__________________
Big Joe
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-03-2006, 07:11 PM
Baylian Baylian is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 93
Cool Bushnell Elite 3200

I have a Bushnell Elite 3200 3-9x40. It was $200. It has rainguard. It also has a rubber edge on the rear eyepiece. It also has a 3.5 inch eye relief.

Good Hunting, TJ
__________________
It is not our abilities that tell us who we are, it is our choices.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-03-2006, 07:36 PM
rem 700 rem 700 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Panhandle of Nebraska
Posts: 164
Best under 200? Leupold Rifleman--I have 2 and are both very clear, and from my heavy 22-250 to my 7mm magnum, it will take a hit with no problems.

Best under 350? Leupold VX-II; even better than the rifleman as far as clarity. Can't go wrong.

Best under 500? You guessed it. Leupold VX-III; enhanced light gathering, fast focus, and from a trusted name.

All of these have a full lifetime warranty, are fully waterproof, and extremely tough. I'd also consider nikon scopes to be up there.
__________________
I like to shoot stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-04-2006, 12:10 AM
Jack Jack is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Georgia
Posts: 6,087
Another good one under $200 is the Burris Fullfield.
Under $350 there's going to be several among Leupold, Burris, Nikon, Bushnell, Pentax, etc.
Under $500? Zeiss Conquest.
__________________
“May we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion.”
Dwight D. Eisenhower
"If the freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter"
George Washington
Jack@huntchat.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-04-2006, 10:04 AM
popplecop popplecop is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Centeral Wisconsin
Posts: 964
I think that you have received some very good advice from the ones that have given it. I personally have a Bushnell Elite 3200 that I mounted on a CZ .22rf and it is a great scope. I have some from most of the makers mentioned and no complaints on any.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-04-2006, 09:33 PM
300 RUM 300 RUM is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Utah
Posts: 109
I have a Burris 3-9x40 with the ballistic plex that was under $200.00. The clarity is above average in that price range, the repeatability was very impressive.

My only complaint is a very minor one. The width of the crosshair. A thinner line would be nice for longer ranges. I have it on a 223 I use for prairie dogs and at 300+ yards they are thick. To give it fair shake my crosshairs in my Elite 3200 are the about the same thickness. With a higher magnification scope, like what is normally on a varmint gun it would not be as big a deal. Or if using it for big game it wont matter anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-06-2006, 08:21 AM
Catfish Catfish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oh.
Posts: 1,607
Over the years I`ve had alot of scopes. I`ve had problem with every brand except Leuopld. I have abt 30 Leupold scopes at present, form 2x to 36x, fixed and variable, and rifle and handgun. The only gun that has something other than a Leuopld on it that I plan on shooting much is a 500 S&W Preformance Center gun I bought with a Burrius scope on it. It shoot well, but I had 2 other Burrius scopes and both were bad so this one makes me very neverious.
__________________
Catfish
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-26-2006, 09:19 AM
Riposte1 Riposte1 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 112
I guess very few folks have enough experience to know definitively, certainly not me. But, like Catfish, I have tried a lot of scopes on a lot of rifles (and shotguns and handguns) and, while I cannot say a Leupold has never failed me, I can say that that brand has failed me fewer times by far than any others and yes I have have tried Zeiss, Kahles, Swarofski and S&B (all of those make great scopes too, but they all have let me down at least once).

I will admit, the older Leupolds (and the Rifleman and VX-1 which seem to be the same) are a bit frustrating to zero but once they are settled in, they seem to stay. leupold is almost always my default optic, though I am willing to try others (just ordered a Kahles this morning).

Riposte
__________________
The will to win is nothing, without the will to prepare.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-26-2006, 09:34 AM
Catfish Catfish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oh.
Posts: 1,607
It finaly happened. I dropped a 13 lb. gun and it landed on the scope knocking thefrount bell loose. So I`m about to find out for myself if Leupolds service is as good as I`ve heard.
__________________
Catfish
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-26-2006, 12:30 PM
Talon's Avatar
Talon Talon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 71
Hello Joe,

I've become very partial to Mueller scopes .

$250.00 http://www.muelleroptics.com/img/pro...MT41650IGR.jpg

$300.00
http://www.muelleroptics.com/img/pro...1044/scope.jpg

FWIW
Talon
__________________
Have a Cigar

Take your time...Don't live to fast....
Troubles will come...And they will pass...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.