#1
|
|||
|
|||
270 wthby mag, 24 or 26 inch barrell.
if you were going to buy a 270 weatherby mag, would you opt for the 24 or 26 inch barrel if you had a choice?
gun used for antelope-deer-possible back up on elk. gun will be shot in open-country, gun will also be up tree stands, shooting fairly close quarters. most shots however under 300 yards. thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I know alot of people how like the 24" bbl's and think the 26" is too clumsy to carry,, but I have always thought that in the weatherby calibers the longer the better,, may not be true,, but ine all carry the 26" tube
__________________
Boliver E. Shagnasty ESQ. Hated of America is the default position of failed individuals and failing states "Niet geschoten is altijd mis" A shot never fired will always miss |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
hofts
I have a 270 Weatherby Mag with a 24" barrel, a 300 Weatherby Mag with a 24" barrel and a 7 Weatherby Mag with a 26" barrel. Personally. I prefer the 24" especially walking through aspen groves and high brush and deer, antelope, and elk won't know the difference.
Muledeer |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
You Need To Be Trained
Without the 26 in barrel the 270 mag is just another 270. The reason I will not own a magnum is because I don't like long barrels. Many times I've seen nimrods with 7mm mags and 22 inch barrels. Their only fooling themselves. A 7m-08 with a 22 inch barrel will out perform a 7mm mag with the same 22 inch barrel. I will admit that the short barreled magnums make a big flash and bang. That's what nimrods really like.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Well if you want a 28" barrel but do not like the overall length of the rifle then get a compact single shot action the rifle with a 26" barrel will likely be the same length or shorter even than a bolt action with a 22" barrel.
I do feel that some folks make a Mountain out of a Molehill over this overall legth thing have never really had a problem with it myself and it amazes me that the upland hunters seem to get by using semi auto shotguns with 28" barrels without too many problems.
__________________
"Don't let the bastards grind you down" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Having chronoed all my rifles, 24 and 26", I'd definitely go the 26.
That little 2" difference really shows up. JMO Dan
__________________
Lifes not meant to be a journey to the grave with the intentions of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thouroughly used up, totally wore out,loudly proclaiming.... WOW.....WHAT A RIDE....... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Dear Hofts;
I want to offer my opinion on your bbl length question. Are you planning on carrying this rifle in heavy brush, open field, or a little of both. I think optimum accuracy and maximum bullet punch will come from a 26" barrel. But, bullet placement with any calibre or barrel lenght is critical and humane!
__________________
Bruce |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Bruce.........the original post is 2001 .............man I hope he got his plans in order by now!
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Sky;
Thanks, I just saw the date on that post.
__________________
Bruce |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
REGISTER DATE
actually, 2001 is when i registered. the posted date on the bottom is actually around 5-5 if i remember correctly.
anyway thanks for all your input. i am prob going to go with a 280 rem anyway. thanks again. |
|
|