Hunt Chat  

Go Back   Hunt Chat > Tools of the Trade > Rifles

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-05-2006, 09:03 AM
hofts hofts is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: sioux falls sd
Posts: 276
270 wthby mag, 24 or 26 inch barrell.

if you were going to buy a 270 weatherby mag, would you opt for the 24 or 26 inch barrel if you had a choice?

gun used for antelope-deer-possible back up on elk.
gun will be shot in open-country,
gun will also be up tree stands, shooting fairly close quarters.
most shots however under 300 yards.
thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-05-2006, 12:15 PM
Leadbutt Leadbutt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tidewater,Virginia
Posts: 136
I know alot of people how like the 24" bbl's and think the 26" is too clumsy to carry,, but I have always thought that in the weatherby calibers the longer the better,, may not be true,, but ine all carry the 26" tube
__________________
Boliver E. Shagnasty ESQ.
Hated of America is the default position of failed individuals and failing states

"Niet geschoten is altijd mis"
A shot never fired will always miss
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-05-2006, 05:33 PM
muledeer's Avatar
muledeer muledeer is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sparks, Nevada
Posts: 1,601
hofts

I have a 270 Weatherby Mag with a 24" barrel, a 300 Weatherby Mag with a 24" barrel and a 7 Weatherby Mag with a 26" barrel. Personally. I prefer the 24" especially walking through aspen groves and high brush and deer, antelope, and elk won't know the difference.
Muledeer
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-05-2006, 07:42 PM
razmuz razmuz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 261
Cool You Need To Be Trained

Without the 26 in barrel the 270 mag is just another 270. The reason I will not own a magnum is because I don't like long barrels. Many times I've seen nimrods with 7mm mags and 22 inch barrels. Their only fooling themselves. A 7m-08 with a 22 inch barrel will out perform a 7mm mag with the same 22 inch barrel. I will admit that the short barreled magnums make a big flash and bang. That's what nimrods really like.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-09-2006, 03:15 AM
Brithunter Brithunter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Eastern England
Posts: 550
Well if you want a 28" barrel but do not like the overall length of the rifle then get a compact single shot action the rifle with a 26" barrel will likely be the same length or shorter even than a bolt action with a 22" barrel.

I do feel that some folks make a Mountain out of a Molehill over this overall legth thing have never really had a problem with it myself and it amazes me that the upland hunters seem to get by using semi auto shotguns with 28" barrels without too many problems.
__________________
"Don't let the bastards grind you down"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-09-2006, 08:49 AM
Dan Morris Dan Morris is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Lakewood, Colorado
Posts: 2,491
Having chronoed all my rifles, 24 and 26", I'd definitely go the 26.
That little 2" difference really shows up. JMO
Dan
__________________
Lifes not meant to be a journey to the grave with the intentions of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thouroughly used up, totally wore out,loudly proclaiming....
WOW.....WHAT A RIDE.......
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-13-2006, 07:55 PM
BruceRN BruceRN is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northeast, Ohio
Posts: 3
Dear Hofts;

I want to offer my opinion on your bbl length question. Are you planning on carrying this rifle in heavy brush, open field, or a little of both. I think optimum accuracy and maximum bullet punch will come from a 26" barrel. But, bullet placement with any calibre or barrel lenght is critical and humane!
__________________
Bruce
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-14-2006, 02:13 AM
Skyline Skyline is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 234
Bruce.........the original post is 2001 .............man I hope he got his plans in order by now!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-14-2006, 08:24 AM
BruceRN BruceRN is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northeast, Ohio
Posts: 3
Hey Sky;

Thanks, I just saw the date on that post.
__________________
Bruce
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-14-2006, 09:37 AM
hofts hofts is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: sioux falls sd
Posts: 276
REGISTER DATE

actually, 2001 is when i registered. the posted date on the bottom is actually around 5-5 if i remember correctly.

anyway thanks for all your input. i am prob going to go with a 280 rem anyway.
thanks again.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.